That should not be the case...Samsung telling customers they need a 920$ hold to exchange it is preposterous! Like the explosive device is worth anything... :/
I think a second recall is a waste of time. It would all but kill the already low consumer confidence in the device. If the airplane device turns out to have been a fluke they can still salvage the 7. I could see carriers dropping it or demoting it to online sales only etc. If there's no longer a demand, they won't stock it in stores, but some online and global sales are better than writing it off.
That being said, if it's another defect then they should just throw in the towel on this one.
Too soon to say, depends on if the device in the plane was faulty or damaged from use. Purely speculative until then.
Unusual pressure? Like tight rear pockets every other phone withstands? Time to face reality. This is not a conspiracy of Apple terroristsThe investigation is important. Was the phone damaged beforehand? Was the charging apparatus faulty? Was it put under some unusual pressure? Was the problem in the battery or did it originate elsewhere? How many replacement units are out there and have there been so far one or maybe two if the weird Chinese report (hello, Taiwan is not China) is accurate, incidents out of say 500,000? Apple has had that many problems and so have several other companies. I am not trying to whitewash this, I just don't get the rush to make judgements based on so few facts. That is why both Samsung the US consumer group want to investigate. Facts, please.
The investigation is important. Was the phone damaged beforehand? Was the charging apparatus faulty? Was it put under some unusual pressure? Was the problem in the battery or did it originate elsewhere? How many replacement units are out there and have there been so far one or maybe two if the weird Chinese report (hello, Taiwan is not China) is accurate, incidents out of say 500,000? Apple has had that many problems and so have several other companies. I am not trying to whitewash this, I just don't get the rush to make judgements based on so few facts. That is why both Samsung the US consumer group want to investigate. Facts, please.
All very good points, but will Southwest Airlines buy it when I board their flight this afternoon.
It's damning that the owner claims it was a replacement device. Why would she lie? I shouldn't have to worry that damaging my phone or using knock-off charging cords may turn my phone into an incendiary device. It's a safety issue. What if I'm on a congested freeway driving at speed when it happens?
Samsung telling customers they need a 920$ hold to exchange it is preposterous! Like the explosive device is worth anything... :/
I agree... If this is a case of being an isolated incident, then are we going to have recall talk of every other phone that fails? An iPhone 6S+ failed in since kids pocket when he was in school last week...The overall point is one incident should not make a company make rash decisions before knowing what occurred. Impatience will get you no where...,,,