1. Savbers's Avatar
    Huawei's Ascend D Quad just beat out the Galaxy S III in Antutu Benchmark.

    Huawei's Ascend D Quad (U9510)
    Parameters:
    Network: GSM, WCDMA
    CPU: Hisilicon K3V2 1.5GHz
    Screen size and resolution: 720x1280 pixels, 4.5 inches
    Camera pixels: front: 1.3 million pixel, back: 8 million pixel
    Memory:1GB RAM
    GPS: Built-in GPS, A-GPS support
    System: Android 4.0

    AnTuTu benchmark score:
    Memory performance score: 2604
    CPU integer performance score: 4300
    CPU floating point performance score: 3335
    2D graphics performance score: 300
    3D graphics performance score: 1269
    Database IO performance score: 550
    SD card write speed score: 150
    SD card read speed score: 193
    Total: 12701

    Samsung's Galaxy SIII (i9300)
    Parameters:
    Network: GSM/WCDMA
    CPU: Exynos 4212 1.5GHz
    Screen size and resolution: 1280x720 pixels, 4.7 inches
    Camera pixels: front: 2 million pixel back: 12 million pixel
    Memory: 1GB RAM
    GPS: Built-in GPS, A-GPS support
    System: Android 4.0

    AnTutu benchmark score:
    Memory performance score: 2483
    CPU integer performance score:3996
    CPU floating point performance score: 3030
    2D graphics performance score: 149
    3D graphics performance score: 1247
    Database IO performance score: 540
    SD card write speed score: 120
    SD card read speed score: 196
    Total: 11761 (on the ranking list this is now ranked as 12158)

    Huawei SMOKED Samsung in almost every category!

    OK, so the Huawei might beat out Samsung in a BENCHMARK. Truth is Samsung has added much, much more than Huawei has and real-life usage will be more consumer friendly on the Galaxy SIII.

    Check the ranking to see where they all sit.
    05-16-2012 09:19 PM
  2. piizzadude's Avatar
    Bechmarks are useless, completely useless.....

    Not defending either phone, don't really care.
    05-16-2012 10:54 PM
  3. Savbers's Avatar
    Bechmarks are useless, completely useless.....

    Not defending either phone, don't really care.
    They're still fun to compare phones!
    hell911 likes this.
    05-17-2012 12:29 AM
  4. hell911's Avatar
    benchmarks are important, not going to explain, go read articles about benchmarks.
    05-17-2012 06:08 AM
  5. Kevin OQuinn's Avatar
    benchmarks are important, not going to explain, go read articles about benchmarks.
    Did you mean to say benchmarks are NOT important? I hope so, because they aren't. The only time they can be useful is when comparing different ROMs/kernels on the same phone. Otherwise it doesn't necessarily equate to a faster real world experience on the device itself.
    05-17-2012 10:16 AM
  6. hell911's Avatar
    for me its important, for others i dont know.
    05-17-2012 10:58 AM
  7. Kevin OQuinn's Avatar
    I wasn't trying to sound harsh, and if I did I apologize.

    They can give a RELATIVE representation of performance, but given different types of RAM, screen resolutions, and software differences it's hard to say that because it's faster at a benchmark that it'll be faster at real world tasks.
    snoopyandroid likes this.
    05-17-2012 11:53 AM
  8. NikolaOvcharski's Avatar
    I've got 11983 in AnTuTu from SGSIII.
    05-17-2012 06:04 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD