bp3dots
Well-known member
Re: This is why the Galaxy S4 is better than the HTC One
Marketing may get people to buy a phone, but it won't get them to keep it, or to word of mouth advertise it to their friends and families.
You continue to assert what the general public will/will not use. The problem is, they don't generally look at things like us "geeks" do. Any you can't honestly say those features won't turn out to be useful or funcional, so there's no point to blast them before even getting to use them.
We'll have to agree to disagree on the design issue, you seem to only think your version of improvement is an improvement.
We're not average consumers; we're geeks on an Android forum discussing the merits of these new "features". Who cares if the public will eat it up? Nobody is doubting that. But that's not a legitimate way to dismiss criticisms of their actual usefulness. And the public will also not get much out of these gimmicks. The functionality is just not there. Tilting to scroll? Subpar photo editing on your phone? Using multiple S4's as a sound system (lol)? S-Translate/Navigation (super lol)? Can you honestly tell me that these features will be highly useful or even work as advertised 100% or even most of the time? THIS is the reason there are 50+ million regular users:
Don't tell me for one second it's because the Samsung phone has a pedometer and accompanying health software.
And as for the design, it's absolutely lazy, especially when compared with the improvements HTC has made. It may still be fine, but it's not on the same level as its competitor.
Marketing may get people to buy a phone, but it won't get them to keep it, or to word of mouth advertise it to their friends and families.
You continue to assert what the general public will/will not use. The problem is, they don't generally look at things like us "geeks" do. Any you can't honestly say those features won't turn out to be useful or funcional, so there's no point to blast them before even getting to use them.
We'll have to agree to disagree on the design issue, you seem to only think your version of improvement is an improvement.