Its very difficult to use any LCD/AMOLED device in full sunlight. Why did the producers choose that situation? Wasn't there a coffee cafe nearby with better lighting? IF I remember right the questions asked the "random people in the park" induced the viewer to believe these people would make a major purchasing decision costing hundreds of dollars and probably locking them into a multi-year contract based on a 1 minute exposure to both devices in harsh sunlight. I was shocked this web site would stoop so low to somehow illustrate that people would like device A or device B. Here you are asking us -- the REAL volunteers -- to tone back our new found enthusiasm for a product the so-called professional journalists lambasted in review after review for having cheap plastic construction. I walked out of the AT&T store today after examining the S4 and HTC One with profound disappointment with the reviewers who repeated the anti-plastic mantra.
Reverse the reviews? Why? I expect neutral honesty from all professional reviewers worth any salt.
No you don't. You want to invent some grand conspiracy that doesn't exist.
People that get to try all the phones as they are released have a different opinion than you do. You'll have to find a way to get over it.
Nothing was set up, nobody stooped anywhere, and you're wrong.