Put in same pocket with 2 phones. The other phone probably scratched it.
Ah k.
Put in same pocket with 2 phones. The other phone probably scratched it.
Not a single scratch of any kind, been using it without a protector 99% of the time. This is what happens OP, when you keep your phone in a pocket without making sure it's free of coins, keys and dirt.
How are oleophobic coating scratches better than glass scratches? A scratch still sucks equallyYep. But people like spreading fear so...
Some have said surface scratches on the coating can be buffed out. Whether that's true or not, I can't say.How are oleophobic coating scratches better than glass scratches? A scratch still sucks equally
Oleophobic scratches won't distort the phone's light like glass scratches do.How are oleophobic coating scratches better than glass scratches? A scratch still sucks equally
Again, I wonder what evidence if any you have for that claim. If a scratch is visible, doesn't that mean it's distorting light? Distortion of light is precisely what makes an object visible.Oleophobic scratches won't distort the phone's light like glass scratches do.
which screen protector should I get
I've had both over several phones. Only the glass scratches were visible when the screen is on.Again, I wonder what evidence if any you have for that claim. If a scratch is visible, doesn't that mean it's distorting light? Distortion of light is precisely what makes an object visible.
Thanks for explaining. But how did you decide which ones were glass scratches and which ones not? Did you consider the scratches to be glass scratches only if you could see them when the screen was on? (And in any case, the scratches that are only visible with the screen off are still distorting light, albeit less so than the other scratches.)I've had both over several phones. Only the glass scratches were visible when the screen is on.
Even glass scratches are seldom visible with phone on unless they are deep enough to feel with your finger. I see no advantage to ugly oleophobic layer scratches over glass surface scratches. Neither can be removed. Both look ugly with phone off. Both subtract from resale valueI've had both over several phones. Only the glass scratches were visible when the screen is on.
Your can tell the Oleophobic scratches as they have very little texture and depth. They're usually clustered together and form more readily on the curves of the screen. Without the coating our phones would look like a disgusting pile of grease. It's definitely an imperfect compromise.Thanks for explaining. But how did you decide which ones were glass scratches and which ones not? Did you consider the scratches to be glass scratches only if you could see them when the screen was on? (And in any case, the scratches that are only visible with the screen off are still distorting light, albeit less so than the other scratches.)
I get that those are the clues you look for when you decide whether the glass or the coating is scratched.Your can tell the Oleophobic scratches as they have very little texture and depth. They're usually clustered together and form more readily on the curves of the screen.
I get that those are the clues you look for when you decide whether the glass or the coating is scratched.
But the part I still don't get is: how do you know that the coating is thick enough to exhibit visible scratches at all? How do you know that all the visible scratches aren't glass scratches?
Are you referring to the one zagg claims has real sapphire but is really a plastic screen protector they're selling for 50 bucks?