1. Linux64's Avatar
    The EVO 3D has a 1.2GHz Qualcomm dual-core CPU
    The SGSII has a 1.2GHz Exynos dual-core CPU
    The Photon has a 1Ghz Nvidia Tegra2 dual-core CPU

    The PC Mag article benchmarked three phones on Sprint the EVO 3D, Photon, and the Galaxy S II Epic 4G touch

    AnTutu Benchmark (overall benchmark):
    SGSII: 5815
    EVO 3D: 3650
    Photon: 4594

    NenaMark (graphics performance):
    SGSII: 47.9
    EVO 3D: 28
    Photon: 24

    BrowserMark:
    SGSII: 49542
    EVO 3D: 41850
    Photon: 42766

    For another comparison, here are the scores from my one year old Epic 4G:
    AnTutu: 2807
    NenaMark: 22.7
    08-30-2011 06:52 PM
  2. Slingbox's Avatar
    08-30-2011 06:55 PM
  3. chuckz28's Avatar
    Will that make the gps work better?

    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
    Better than what? Find me a phone that pulls up a location faster. Gs2 has no gps issues, you're thinking about the original galaxy.
    08-30-2011 09:05 PM
  4. ZDriver's Avatar
    He is trolling every post in this forum! He is clearly a NOT so happy EVO3d owner having buyers remorse.
    08-30-2011 09:30 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD