2100mah battery

[CBMC]

No. What I said was, if the battery reported in the Nexus out there is 1750, it is either GSM, or an older hardware revision for LTE. That implies that testers for LTE have seen more than one hardware revision (which is what I meant). Sorry for any confusion.

Ok. Understand now. Will probably just get an extended battery anyway.

Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

 

[tx_tuff]

So I Google searched Galaxy Nexus battery (images) and came across pictures of the back of the phone open with the 1750 mah battery and ones with a 3.7V battery. In some cases both in the same article and it seems none of them caught the 3.7V = 2100 mah. I will add that all the 3.7V ones look different then the picture posted by the OP (black instead of blue) and they all look like PR/stock shots.

FYI some of these pictures have been out there since Oct 18th and nobody has noticed I guess.

This may be the best picture that doesn't look stock from Engadget showing 3.7V Samsung Galaxy Nexus hands-on! - Engadget Galleries http://www.engadget.com/photos/samsung-galaxy-nexus-hands-on/#4538665

 

[VideoEngineerAJS]

So I Google searched Galaxy Nexus battery (images) and came across pictures of the back of the phone open with the 1750 mah battery and ones with a 3.7V battery. In some cases both in the same article and it seems none of them caught the 3.7V = 2100 mah. I will add that all the 3.7V ones look different then the picture posted by the OP (black instead of blue) and they all look like PR/stock shots.

FYI some of these pictures have been out there since Oct 18th and nobody has noticed I guess.

This may be the best picture that doesn't look stock from Engadget showing 3.7V Samsung Galaxy Nexus hands-on! - Engadget Galleries Samsung Galaxy Nexus hands-on! - Engadget Galleries

That's the GSM version and it's not the 3.7V that everyone is talking about. It's the 7.77Wh, the pictures of that version that you showed looks like it says 6.48Wh.

 

[tx_tuff]

That's the GSM version and it's not the 3.7V that everyone is talking about. It's the 7.77Wh, the pictures of that version that you showed looks like it says 6.48Wh.

Thanks, I was just looking at the Volts haha, I'm not a tech guy as you can tell.

 

[JRZLocal]

As long as its removable and I can get an extra battery, I don't care. That's one of the things that turned me off about the razor.