Active 2 vs moto 360 46mm display size

Jeff Merheb

Banned
Dec 12, 2019
5
0
1
Hello
I am very tempted to get the Active 2, though as I have found the Moto 360 46mm display the minimum acceptable size for me without using eyeglasses, I wonder if the display area of the Active 2 is as large as the Moto.
The 360 is said to be 1.56" but it's perhaps the whole watch diameter including the stainless borders no? While the Active 2 display is truelly 1.4"
 
you can always change the watch face to make it easier to see. that is what I do. me eyes aint what they used to be. personally I would go with the smallest watch that has the features I need. If yo use samsung pay, stick with the samsung watch. if you use google pay, go with the other.
 
Hello
I am very tempted to get the Active 2, though as I have found the Moto 360 46mm display the minimum acceptable size for me without using eyeglasses, I wonder if the display area of the Active 2 is as large as the Moto.
The 360 is said to be 1.56" but it's perhaps the whole watch diameter including the stainless borders no? While the Active 2 display is truelly 1.4"

What phone do you have?

I have a Pixel 3. Just bought an Active2. It's so good I'm buying a Samsung phone next go round. Pixel is dying on the vine. I'm done with them. Samsung is tightening their integration just like apple (unfortunately) but it's the best experience. Tizen is faster and more fluid than WearOS, they say.
 
What phone do you have?

I have a Pixel 3. Just bought an Active2. It's so good I'm buying a Samsung phone next go round. Pixel is dying on the vine. I'm done with them. Samsung is tightening their integration just like apple (unfortunately) but it's the best experience. Tizen is faster and more fluid than WearOS, they say.
I recently switched from Wear OS devices to Samsung smartwatches. I am very happy!
The lag on the Wear OS devices just got to be too irritating.
Samsung smartwatches are snappy and if using a Samsung phone, is a great experience.