- Oct 28, 2009
- 1,231
- 97
- 0
So I'm shopping for an eReader for my mother for her birthday. Trying to do my research on both the Kindle and the Nook to see which one she'll like more. I come across CNet for some comparison charts and read their reviews and I come across this for the Nook:
...
...
This is why I stopped listening to CNet when it comes to phones. But now I see I can't rely on them for anything because EVERYTHING is compared to an iPhone. The first sentence of that last quote should have sent off a little light in the editors head that said, well maybe I shouldn't do the Nook/iPhone comparison. Because it makes NO SENSE! Next thing you know they'll be comparing a Hyundai Hybrid to an iPad saying the iPad has more 'zip'. Get over yourself CNet. You suck!
Edit: I still can't decide on which one to get, so if you have any thoughts, I'll be happy to listen.
Using the touch-screen navigation pad does take some getting used to, particularly if you're accustomed to using a touch-screen phone like the iPhone. Your initial urge is to touch the e-ink part of the screen, but then you gradually get used to the concept of confining your touches to the screen at the bottom and the Nook logo that sits just above the screen. That Nook "button" serves as a home button that turns the color screen on when it's asleep; for energy-saving purposes, you can set the screen to turn off after 10, 30, or 60 seconds when not in use.
...
That said, one of the noticeable drawbacks of the device is that it just can't measure up to the iPhone or iPod Touch (particularly the most recent generation) in terms of speed and performance. Yes, the touch screen is more responsive than the laggy e-ink screen, and yes, you can flip through your reading collection Cover Flow-style, but you're just not going to get that buttery smoothness you encounter with the iPhone. Combine that minor sluggishness with a cellular wireless connection (sometimes AT&T's 3G service is quite fast, but sometimes it's not, depending on the quality of the signal and your location) and there will be moments you'll wish the device was zippier.
...
True, the speed gripe is par for the course with e-ink-based e-book readers; all of them still stutter and flash when moving from page to page and generally have slow start-up times after a full shutdown (the Nook does, too). However, the firmware upgrades have managed to fix earlier gripes about sluggish load times when opening books and noticeably slower page turns (compared with the Kindle). Again, though we'd always like a little more zip, the Nook is generally peppier than it was when first launched.
This is why I stopped listening to CNet when it comes to phones. But now I see I can't rely on them for anything because EVERYTHING is compared to an iPhone. The first sentence of that last quote should have sent off a little light in the editors head that said, well maybe I shouldn't do the Nook/iPhone comparison. Because it makes NO SENSE! Next thing you know they'll be comparing a Hyundai Hybrid to an iPad saying the iPad has more 'zip'. Get over yourself CNet. You suck!
Edit: I still can't decide on which one to get, so if you have any thoughts, I'll be happy to listen.