- Jun 30, 2012
- 410
- 0
- 0
Hey guys, so gizmodo have been using their Samsung galaxy s4 for a week now and they are saying it's a great phone, but the htc one is better. Mainly for reasons I have suggested in other posts, but also for a couple of other reasons.
Main points:
Camera is very good, but slow. In low light the htc is king, naturally.
The new features are all rubbish, and nobody will use them. I think we knew this?
Despite being clocked faster than the one, the phone has annoying lag and jerk. The one whips it for smoothness.
Sound is not great on speaker. Obviously the one will crush it here too.
They are the main points. They still say it's a great phone but the htc one is "a level above"
I Have never owned an HTC by the way, and currently use a galaxy s3.
Main points:
Camera is very good, but slow. In low light the htc is king, naturally.
The new features are all rubbish, and nobody will use them. I think we knew this?
Despite being clocked faster than the one, the phone has annoying lag and jerk. The one whips it for smoothness.
Sound is not great on speaker. Obviously the one will crush it here too.
They are the main points. They still say it's a great phone but the htc one is "a level above"
I Have never owned an HTC by the way, and currently use a galaxy s3.
Last edited: