Good new hands on and benchmark article, evo 3d and sensation

[MannyZ28]

AnandTech - Hands on and Benchmarks of two MSM8x60 Phones - HTC Sensation 4G and HTC EVO 3D

Cool article by anandtech. Has a little video too.

 

[Over-iOS]

Good article, but I can't figure out how to get to the rest of the article. :-/
I don't see the benchmarks or the videos.

Never mind, I figured it out.


I haven't had my coffee yet, so please bare with me.

 

[Teso Dos Bichos]

Look under the gallery for the HTC ChaCha and Salsa Tour and above the comments:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4416/...8x60-phones-htc-sensation-4g-and-htc-evo-3d/2

 

[sprinttouch]

YEAH! glad to see 3rd gen snapdragon pwns Tegra 2 The Evo 3D is gunna be a freakin beast!

 

[basegod]

So the EVO 3D didn't score as well because it has to account for more pixels?

 

[MannyZ28]

So the EVO 3D didn't score as well because it has to account for more pixels?

Yes, there are 35% more pixels for the Evo3d and the Atrix to calculate, that's more work and is reflected in lower scores.

 

[basegod]

35% more pixels then compared to what, other 4.3 inch screens with lower resolutions? So if we multiply the scores by 1.35 we get then numbers that 3D would get with a lower res screen?

I know its more about the experience then the numbers, but I'd just like to know.

 

[Over-iOS]

My brain hurts.

 

[MannyZ28]

35% more pixels then compared to what, other 4.3 inch screens with lower resolutions? So if we multiply the scores by 1.35 we get then numbers that 3D would get with a lower res screen?

I know its more about the experience then the numbers, but I'd just like to know.

Do the simple math...most other Android phones use 480 x 800. So that's what we compare the qHD resolution too. At 540 x960 you just have that many more pixels that need to be calculated, so that's quite an additional workload.

Don't know if that answers your question since I didn't quite understand it.