News Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus: There's only one clear winner

[AC News]

The Pixel 9 Pro XL has a stunning design, a new chip, and faster charging. Is that enough to take down the more affordable Galaxy S24 Plus?

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus: There's only one clear winner : Read more

 

[Bkdodger1]

There's never a clear winner.

 

[kiniku]

This boils down to your preferences. In the past, I have always bought flagships. But I don't game on phones. So the battery drain associated with that wasn't a priority to me.
A good camera is. Decent (non-gaming) battery life is. And having bank grade face unlock on an Android phone, huge bonus points for me.

Love the Pixel! Both 8 and 9. But 9 more

 

[leev]

Ive owned pixels 4 times and just got my girl a s24 im telling you google isnt even close I canceled my pixel 9 preorder ill scrape for a s24 Ultra to get off this picel 7 that looks like its from 2015

 

[Spaz888]

Yup. The language used by the blogger is clearer biased in favor of Pixel.

I can't wait to read about all the Pixel [hardware] issues within the next few months.

 

[Spaz888]

The Pixel 9 Pro XL has a stunning design, a new chip, and faster charging. Is that enough to take down the more affordable Galaxy S24 Plus?

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus: There's only one clear winner : Read more

No. The design is as stunning as White OJ's hair.

Either the blogger or this site were paid to give the Pixel a glowing review. This includes. but not limited to having the device provided gratis and other considerations.

 

[Spaz888]

This boils down to your preferences. In the past, I have always bought flagships. But I don't game on phones. So the battery drain associated with that wasn't a priority to me.
A good camera is. Decent (non-gaming) battery life is. And having bank grade face unlock on an Android phone, huge bonus points for me.

Love the Pixel! Both 8 and 9. But 9 more

No. It boils down reliability. The Pixel speakers are a major let down which is a testament to how cheap the phone is. I had the 7 and it went back. It was all but cheap garbage and the 8 wasn't any better.

Sadly confirmation and survivor bias are the norm these days especially within the Pixel echo chamber

 

[gmschoen]

Based solely on the info from this article, I don't see why anyone would pay $100+ more for a mid-range processor. The Pixel isn't bad, but Google saves a ton of cash on the cheaper processor and it's not reflected in the value of the device. The higher resolution specialty camera doesn't mean better quality, as everyone knows MP alone doesn't reveal image quality. The only ones who will be eager to pay this premium are the ones who want the software.

 

[djtx1234]

I'm a bit confused. The review cites the sharp corners on the Samsung S24+ but it has rounded corners. The S24 Ultra has sharp corners. Is this review actually comparing against the Ultra model?

 

[mustang7757]

I'm a bit confused. The review cites the sharp corners on the Samsung S24+ but it has rounded corners. The S24 Ultra has sharp corners. Is this review actually comparing against the Ultra model?

Good catch, the picture of the device does look to be the S24+ model not the S24U in the article.

 

[Bamboo Box]

So the S24 has faster charger but it's still listed as a con? Lmao what a lazy article, might want to consider a career change, bud. Seen AI scrappers build better articles than this.