- Sep 6, 2012
- 33
- 0
- 0
does anyone think Google have a higher markup on the Pixels compared to the iPhones considering they don't have the overhead/expense of running hundreds of physical stores?
Last edited:
but if you look at prices, Pixels mirror iPhones and yet don't have the overhead of physical stores
but if you look at prices, Pixels mirror iPhones and yet don't have the overhead of physical stores
There is a lot to factor in when it comes to markups and you can't get it without insider knowledge. I would probably say that the iPhone has a higher markup. Apple can demand better pricing from their suppliers.
Do not forget about the luxury phone market. I am sure they have everyone beat as it relates to markups
But I'd say iPhone markup would be pretty hard to beat.
but you're only considering the bill of materials. You haven't factored in the expense of local distribution (in my country, all Pixel (even sold from play.google.com.country-domain-here are coming from overseas) + the expense of a physical store.
Most phones have to travel internationally and the physical stores sell more than just iPhones. I would still say that iPhone's mark up is bigger but that doesn't mean the Pixel it too high for an Android phone. It could probably beat the iPhone in time but I would be surprised if it did it right out of the gate. This is all speculation but I do enjoy the discussion.True.
Most phones have to travel internationally
no one is stopping Google to sell their other devices and accessories in their own stores if they have onethe physical stores sell more than just iPhones
does anyone think Google have a higher markup on the Pixels compared to the iPhones considering they don't have the overhead/expense of running hundreds of physical stores?