- Nov 16, 2010
- 17,654
- 215
- 0
I think it would be prudent for them to start coming to their senses. People are still strapped for cash (lol...been troubleshooting devices a lot recently I almost typed cache....) that they are trying to find ways to trim the budget. I have even known people to temporarily give up the smartphone for a few months just to loosen the collar a little.
But they aren't exactly bleeding customers and are continuing to add more quarter after quarter.
I think that outside of forums like these, there are lots of people who don't have to have the latest and greatest device or unlimited data and would like ATT's new subsidized phoneless plans.True, but this may only be the beginning.
I am not sure what you mean? Verizon's $45 plan is cheaper than attt by $15, and cheaper than the closest tmobile plan by $5, and tmobile doesn't even include subsidy on that play making the difference closer to $20. Now tmobile does offer 500mb vs 250mb, and it is 2g after that on tmobile. But for those on the low data end, Verizon is the cheapest by a bit
Sent from my Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 3 via Tapatalk Pro
I thought AT&T's plans started @ $45.
Sent from my Plutonium 5s 64
I think that outside of forums like these, there are lots of people who don't have to have the latest and greatest device or unlimited data and would like ATT's new subsidized phoneless plans.
ya, that is what I meant by subsidized phoneless, but I guess it was not the most clear way to phrase it, lol!If it doesn't include a phone then it is unsubsidized.
