The thunderbolt does not have terrible battery life.. Using a standard battery life expectation when dealing with an LTE modems in a mobile phone is not fair.
You are speaking of a device that when I did a speed test this am i am getting 21Mbs down... thats faster then some cable modems. So the fact that it drinks deeply out of the juice pack should be expected.
Do not let the reports from "insiders" sway your thoughts.. the device is quite good we just need battery tech to take it to the next level...
The Panda...
i think blog sites are just screaming for info to report. rumors are rumors. ill go with panda.
The iPhone is not cheaper than the Thunderbolt. It has a considerably smaller screen and is not 4G (which contribute to its battery life), so you're right that it is not competitive with the Bolt.Yes. Not only is it not a product competitive with the iPhone, but it's also a major hassle to have to worry about battery constantly. It's a mobile phone, not one that needs to be physically anchored every 6-8 hours. And yes, I'm sure you can spin out stories of how most days you're at your desk and then car etc.. that's not the point. The point is it's possible now to make a phone that lasts. Both the iPhone and the Atrix have shown that. And they're both cheaper than the Thunderbolt.
With my last few smartphones, I typically carry two spare batteries, and sometimes at least one of those spares is an exteneded life battery. I travel a lot so I buy a lot of batteries. I like my screen bright, too, for my tired old eyes!NO! At the rate I normally use a phone, no smartphone currently available has enough juice to last me a day without recharging. That is why I always (almost always) carry a spare battery.
But hey, that's just me. I am not saying everyone should do it. I'm just saying that is what I do.