- Nov 7, 2015
- 10
- 0
- 0
It's pretty astonishing to see how few articles can skew popular opinions and polarise the thoughts of the masses.
The issue of modules have been presented in a very negative light. My own perspective on the modular design is that it facilitates both EXPANDABILITY and REDUCIBILTY.
All the people who have made their PCs could relate to it, there are components necessary for build to work and some are additions as per the need of the builder.
Example, my pc has a geforce gpu and not a quadro cause my requirements doesnt include any professional graphic designing and chores.*
Similarly i can buy a barebone phone , then add buy a modular dac/amp to quench my Audiophilia. Another one of friend doesnt need that dac/amp(seriously how many can percieve difference between a FLAC or 320kbps mp3) and he wont have to pay a damn penny for what he doesnt actually need , allowing a lower retail price for the phone and allowing the maufacturer to get some extra bucks by capitalizing on the niches. It's a win win situation for both the sides.
(Given that Lg undercuts its competetiors prices by around 100 bucks, it cant make more sense.)
The same goes for having physical camera buttons(perk of battery increment included) or keyboard or kitchen sink whatever modules come in the future.
What about DEM BEZELS? , I beleive that symmetry is kind of under-rated and "youraverageconsumer" prefers a symmetrical phone over LGs established thin forehead large chin design.
The phone is HIDEOUS , well thats just plain subjective , i felt the same for nexus 6p but with time it starting giving them techy vibes which are irreproducible by other designs, same holds for LG G5.
Before it goes completely unnoticed i would like to give creds to LG for inconspicuous antenna bands giving that clean aesthetic to the phone.
TL;DR - put down your pitchforks and torches and enjoy the time when amazing pieces of hardware like G5 and S7 were released
Posted via the Android Central App
The issue of modules have been presented in a very negative light. My own perspective on the modular design is that it facilitates both EXPANDABILITY and REDUCIBILTY.
All the people who have made their PCs could relate to it, there are components necessary for build to work and some are additions as per the need of the builder.
Example, my pc has a geforce gpu and not a quadro cause my requirements doesnt include any professional graphic designing and chores.*
Similarly i can buy a barebone phone , then add buy a modular dac/amp to quench my Audiophilia. Another one of friend doesnt need that dac/amp(seriously how many can percieve difference between a FLAC or 320kbps mp3) and he wont have to pay a damn penny for what he doesnt actually need , allowing a lower retail price for the phone and allowing the maufacturer to get some extra bucks by capitalizing on the niches. It's a win win situation for both the sides.
(Given that Lg undercuts its competetiors prices by around 100 bucks, it cant make more sense.)
The same goes for having physical camera buttons(perk of battery increment included) or keyboard or kitchen sink whatever modules come in the future.
What about DEM BEZELS? , I beleive that symmetry is kind of under-rated and "youraverageconsumer" prefers a symmetrical phone over LGs established thin forehead large chin design.
The phone is HIDEOUS , well thats just plain subjective , i felt the same for nexus 6p but with time it starting giving them techy vibes which are irreproducible by other designs, same holds for LG G5.
Before it goes completely unnoticed i would like to give creds to LG for inconspicuous antenna bands giving that clean aesthetic to the phone.
TL;DR - put down your pitchforks and torches and enjoy the time when amazing pieces of hardware like G5 and S7 were released
Posted via the Android Central App
Last edited: