I cannot speak to the 3500, but the HTC 2750 lasts far longer than the 3200. If you can find it cheaper than the HTC then I would say try it... otherwise save your money.
Seems weird that a 2750 would last longer then the 3500,but who knows.
Hum, I was wondering about the that one. Not sure I'd like that BIG hump and there's not a good selection of cases either. I usually get a full day of use from the stock battery, I turn off eveything including mobile networking. I turn it on when I'm at lunch or on a break and wifi at homeI'm not a fan of the thicker batteries, but I recently got Seidio's "thin" 1750 mAh battery for the thunderbolt, and it is almost doubling my old stock battery (I'd say it lasts about 80% longer).
Dunno about their thick batteries, but I'm impressed with their thin models.
I'm not a fan of the thicker batteries, but I recently got Seidio's "thin" 1750 mAh battery for the thunderbolt, and it is almost doubling my old stock battery (I'd say it lasts about 80% longer).
Dunno about their thick batteries, but I'm impressed with their thin models.
Below even the Stock battery? We must be looking at different batteries.
Even running Netflix from full to dead, the 1750 battery will last at least an hour and a half longer than the stock battery.
I wish I could find the article, but it had tests run on the true MaH of each battery. The 1750 battery by Seidio was only slightly better at best and it may have been worse. I remember an extended battery of some sort by Seidio only being 1300 MaH.
But even if your battery was better than stock, 350 MaH isn't a lot. And it's certainly not anywhere near 80% higher in life. Mainly because it's a fact that the battery doesn't run at 1750 MaH. My extended battery (2750, HTC) nearly doubles the capacity. No way a 1750 (as I said, not really) is near 80%.
Please do not think this is a flame post at you as it's not. Just pointing out the facts based on what appears to be extensive testing of each battery from Seidio to OEM to other makers.