- Jul 6, 2010
- 37
- 0
- 0
Oh Good lord. While I know that benchmarks are FAR from then end all be all method of telling a systems performance. But still. All the reviews I've been seeing have only been on the quad core model. And they only give the overall score. I finally ran across a pretty good review of the system:
[YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bq3E_RfzxE[/YT]
That finally gives a breakdown of each score. For the heck of it I compared it to my EVO 4G.
Test\ EVO 4G \ Galaxy S3
CPU: 1900 \ 8201
Memory: 1103 \ 7119
I/O: 670 \ 6955
2D: 303 \ 1014
3D: 539 \ 2207
In short, this is what a current phone looks like compared to a 2 year old one. I think we are well past kicking its butt into vaporizing the thing with a Hadouken type territory at this point. x_x
So in short. *grabby hands: runs around the room in circles* Verizon gimmegimmegimmegimmegimmegimme!!!
All joking aside. The pace of hardware advancement for phone is actually rather stunning. I was around for the 286, 386, 486, Pentium evolution and while that was impressive the overall progress in mobile tech is nothing short of jaw dropping.
[YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bq3E_RfzxE[/YT]
That finally gives a breakdown of each score. For the heck of it I compared it to my EVO 4G.
Test\ EVO 4G \ Galaxy S3
CPU: 1900 \ 8201
Memory: 1103 \ 7119
I/O: 670 \ 6955
2D: 303 \ 1014
3D: 539 \ 2207
In short, this is what a current phone looks like compared to a 2 year old one. I think we are well past kicking its butt into vaporizing the thing with a Hadouken type territory at this point. x_x
So in short. *grabby hands: runs around the room in circles* Verizon gimmegimmegimmegimmegimmegimme!!!
All joking aside. The pace of hardware advancement for phone is actually rather stunning. I was around for the 286, 386, 486, Pentium evolution and while that was impressive the overall progress in mobile tech is nothing short of jaw dropping.
