made the right choice

I think the fact that Sprint has such poor coverage and download speeds compared to Big Red should be taken into account. It appears that the radio's are identical.

Agree especially since the sprint users are stuck on 3g and do not have the chance to see how the lte radios work.
 
Has anyone been reading the Sprint forum about the poor Wifi and cellular radios in the SGIII. It sounds like the only improvement for Samsung has been the GPS radio. I was really looking forward to getting this phone but sold my Galaxy Nexus because of the radio problems. Not looking to relive 6 months of that again. I wish you all the best of luck and hope that I am wrong in my assumption that the SGIII will have connection problems just like every Samsung phone I have ever owned.


I actually read in the Sprint forums that the SGS3 shows lower bars than the EVO, but both actually have the same dbm when you go into settings. Might just be a status bar issue. I haven't read anyone saying their actual reception was bad. I also read the WiFi was great, so not sure about that one either.
 
I'm glad I ordered a white one also. The blue didn't do it for me. I played with one at the local sprint store an was blew away at the screen. It makes my razr screen look like butt.
 
I actually read in the Sprint forums that the SGS3 shows lower bars than the EVO, but both actually have the same dbm when you go into settings. Might just be a status bar issue. I haven't read anyone saying their actual reception was bad. I also read the WiFi was great, so not sure about that one either.

It appears to be people are going just by the "bars" and not the actual signal. I am perfectly fine with it showing lower bars but having a good dbm. bars do not bother me it is the signal I am worried about.
 
This was a problem with the og dinc. Signal always registered low on the phone but usually had great signal
 

Trending Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
956,989
Messages
6,970,936
Members
3,163,679
Latest member
Bantuan