Moto X 2013 vs Moto C Plus

mohit9206

Well-known member
Jun 30, 2013
407
0
0
Visit site
Can the $120 2017 budget phone be better than $500 flagship from 2013?

Processor - No idea if Snapdragon S4 Pro would be better than Mediatek 6737. Maybe someone here can tell me.

Graphics - Adreno 320 without a doubt is way better than Mali T720

Display - Moto X 2013 is better

Camera - No idea which would be better

Build quality - Pretty sure Moto X would be better

Battery life - Moto C Plus wins this easily

Looks like other than battery life, Moto C cannot match up to the Moto X 2013.
 

Ry

Moderator Captain
Trusted Member
Nov 16, 2010
17,654
214
0
Visit site
My point was to see if enough progress has been made that a budget phone of today can match or beat a flagship device from 4 years ago by the same company.

The Moto C is bottom, entry-level. Budget is still higher, like the Moto E/G.
 

mohit9206

Well-known member
Jun 30, 2013
407
0
0
Visit site
The Moto C is bottom, entry-level. Budget is still higher, like the Moto E/G.
d3ab13b6d84b55954791eb1ce5f23755.jpg

Ok that makes sense.
Also can you explain why does it have physical capacitive navigation keys even though android hasn't needed it since ICS?
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
944,352
Messages
6,922,465
Members
3,159,513
Latest member
Apep4000