- Nov 16, 2010
- 17,654
- 215
- 0
Some people won't have to carry around an adapter (me).I don't see the point to making a phone so thin that you have to carry around a headphone adaptor and then add a bulky battery mod to give it more juice. They could have at least integrated the headphone jack into some of the modules. Even adding a Style cover adds bulk. They could at least left the headphone jack in the Force version.
Oh and the speculated price of these phones is way to high.
Posted via the Android Central App
Some people won't have to carry around an adapter (me).
Some people won't have to carry around an adapter (me).
I am. But that's all I'll say before I bow out. I won't get into conversations with "audiophiles" about the topic of cell phone audio quality. There's too many people mixing sound for big Hollywood movies on the train, on their phone, and they all neeeeeeed the best sound possible.If you are referring to Bluetooth....the quality isn't there yet
Posted via the Android Central App
I am. But that's all I'll say before I bow out. I won't get into conversations with "audiophiles" about the topic of cell phone audio quality. There's too many people mixing sound for big Hollywood movies on the train, on their phone, and they all neeeeeeed the best sound possible.
Many experiments have shown when you take away the cues that tell you what you're tasting/seeing/hearing the "obvious" differences suddenly disappear. Humans just aren't that good at consistently judging the "better" of similar things in a vacuum.I think if the masses will buy decent quality stuff, they won't care, and will even come to love the wireless-ness. I'd guess more than half of the people who complain about bluetooth quality either have crap devices or can't actually tell the difference, but want to sound like elite audiophile snobs. Not saying there isn't a difference, but I doubt that "the masses" would notice or care if it wasn't popular to complain about it.