I just feel like the word "innovate" is tossed around so much that people have stopped thinking about what it means. The Wii, when it first came out, was innovative, as was the galaxy Nexus with its on screen navigation buttons. Those are things that weren't necessarily a natural progression of the field, and were both new and different at the time of release.
I knew I should've picked another word instead of "innovative". You're right and I agree about what you said about people losing and forgetting the proper definition of the word. I used it in the sense of the device being and having something new, but not being entirely as "first of its kind" new in order to be considered a completely revolutionary device. I'm sorry if I caused this offset misinterpretation of the word. My bad.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Android Central Forums