I see your point. Although I'm thinking NVIDIA is targeting this at the more savvy or advanced gamer. Those who will already have a higher end router and internet connection supporting 5 G WiFi connections and internet speeds in the 30+ mbps download range w/ reasonable ping rates. I personally see many gamers now running 100 mbps connections for online gaming, since cable internet like Comcast or Time Warner are offering a jump from 50 mbps packages to 100+ mbps packages for only $10 or $15 more per month on package deals. So for those meeting this criteria this would be an excellent experience.
Based off what I've experienced using NVIDIA's GRID service via their SHIELD TABLET & SHIELD PORTABLE the online gaming experience is pretty impressive. I do like the fact of streaming games and not having to store them locally thus eliminating the need to purchase a HD upgrade to hold your favorite games.
I think that's correct. You need to pay for the 1080P/60FPS service instead of 720P/30FPS and still buy the games. I seriously doubt it will be cheaper than Xbox Live or Playstation Plus currently is, so that's also going to be interesting to see.I'm the perfect candidate for an Nvidia shield (console). I haven't bought an xbox one or ps4 yet and I've already have a shield tablet. I've experienced the grid service and pc streaming. I pay for a great 50mbps service and I've plaed witcher 2 for hours at a time without any problems. It all comes down to pricing of the grid service for me. I'm actually pretty confused how they envision their pricing model.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but to my understanding it breaks down into two(possibly 3) camps
A) basic subscription= older games (360/ps3 generation games) streamed at 720p
b) premium subscription = AAA current gen games (xbox one/ps4) streamed at 1080p And/or you have to buy each game
If it's the premium sub+buy that's ridiculous and I will pass and just buy an xbox one come May. Another factor is how will the service do under the influx of many new people. I have been playing metro madness from the second it came out and I'm 100% sure that when many people are playing it it bogs down. My connection is fine and other grid games play great.
I'll just use my tablet see how the service runs for a month or two after launch then decide.
Well the games are supposed to be streamed, meaning you don't need them stored locally. It does mean no offline playing thoughThe 16gig of storage will be the reason I don't get one if I don't. With games so large these days, that is just not enough. Not all devs will let you off load on to external.
I will be getting an android TV this year though, and this may be the one. I have an Nvidia gpu in my gaming rig that can stream to shield stuff, so that would be a pro for this over the razer Forge. Plus you get the Tegra optimized games.
Sent from my XT1096
That's a concern of mine when it comes to purchasing. If I purchase something I should be able to access it when/however I want. I purchase a movie via the play store I can stream or download it. If I pay a monthly subscription for netflix, I'm fine with that streaming model. Maybe they will support external hdd via the usb ports so you can download large games.Well the games are supposed to be streamed, meaning you don't need them stored locally. It does mean no offline playing though
While I get that they are pushing the streaming, that tech will be not viable for a large number of people for the foreseeable future. Even when it is viable, there are always drawbacks.Well the games are supposed to be streamed, meaning you don't need them stored locally. It does mean no offline playing though
I have been thinking of getting one myself. Probably more use it for Android Games, and at $200, it's not that big of a hit to the wallet.