Welcome to the all-new Android Central Forums! - We're still moving some things around, so you may see a few quirks here and there, but we're working on getting things fully completed as soon as possible. For now, take a look around, and if you run into any major issues, please let us know in this thread!
SizeThe two phones are nearly identical in size. The only significant difference is that the Droid Maxx is nine percent thicker than the svelte GS4.
WeightThere are heavier phones than the Droid Maxx, but a featherweight it is not. It tips the scales at a full 28 percent heavier than the Galaxy S4.
BuildThe Droid Maxx sticks with the kevlar build that Motorola has been using for its Droid Razr line for the last couple of years. Here it's covering more of the phone than ever. (kevlar is a really strong and tough material)
DisplayBoth displays give you the same spacious 5-inch layout, but the Galaxy S4 is much sharper. The Droid Maxx's 294 pixels per inch should make for a pretty sharp screen, but that's still a fairly low number for a high-end 2013 Smartphone.
ProcessorThe Motorola X8 is the branding for the system-on-a-chip in the new Droid phones, but the processor is (according to Ars Technica) a slight variation of a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro, which was featured in several high-end handsets in late 2012.
Who WonSo the GS4 wins this round. But let's keep this in perspective: both phones blow away the fastest phones from just a couple of years ago, and will be plenty fast for most users.
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with a lot of this. First of all people have reported being either not able to tell the difference in the resolutions of the screens, or even that the Maxx screen looks better in spite of the higher res on the GS4. So go look at them yourself if this is an issue. Review after review says the Maxx has an excellent screen (and I agree).
The GS4 may have a better benchmarking processor, but few people notice any kind of issues with the Maxx's processing power. It's fast and smooth. Beyond that, it's smart, so you benefit from the "always listening" features, among others. The Maxx also has less to process, since it's closer to stock Android. It's like if a car has an extra 50 hp, but weighs an extra 500lbs. It's questionable if it will be faster.
IMO, the real life user experience of the Maxx beats the GS4. Between never having to think about your battery, to the wonderfully useful always listening features, to the just overall fast & smooth experience, it's excellent. I think the GS4 can be had cheaper, so if I were to get it, that would be why.
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with a lot of this. First of all people have reported being either not able to tell the difference in the resolutions of the screens, or even that the Maxx screen looks better in spite of the higher res on the GS4. So go look at them yourself if this is an issue. Review after review says the Maxx has an excellent screen (and I agree).
The GS4 may have a better benchmarking processor, but few people notice any kind of issues with the Maxx's processing power. It's fast and smooth. Beyond that, it's smart, so you benefit from the "always listening" features, among others. The Maxx also has less to process, since it's closer to stock Android. It's like if a car has an extra 50 hp, but weighs an extra 500lbs. It's questionable if it will be faster.
IMO, the real life user experience of the Maxx beats the GS4. Between never having to think about your battery, to the wonderfully useful always listening features, to the just overall fast & smooth experience, it's excellent. I think the GS4 can be had cheaper, so if I were to get it, that would be why.
To add to this, there are still reports of lag on the S4. Not to be found on the Maxx. And the screen on the Maxx is just as good to the average user.
SizeThe two phones are nearly identical in size. The only significant difference is that the Droid Maxx is nine percent thicker than the svelte GS4.
WeightThere are heavier phones than the Droid Maxx, but a featherweight it is not. It tips the scales at a full 28 percent heavier than the Galaxy S4.
BuildThe Droid Maxx sticks with the kevlar build that Motorola has been using for its Droid Razr line for the last couple of years. Here it's covering more of the phone than ever. (kevlar is a really strong and tough material)
DisplayBoth displays give you the same spacious 5-inch layout, but the Galaxy S4 is much sharper. The Droid Maxx's 294 pixels per inch should make for a pretty sharp screen, but that's still a fairly low number for a high-end 2013 Smartphone.
ProcessorThe Motorola X8 is the branding for the system-on-a-chip in the new Droid phones, but the processor is (according to Ars Technica) a slight variation of a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro, which was featured in several high-end handsets in late 2012.
Who WonSo the GS4 wins this round. But let's keep this in perspective: both phones blow away the fastest phones from just a couple of years ago, and will be plenty fast for most users.
People really are overselling the virtures of the kevlar implemented on this phone.
The Kevlar is for nothing more than looks and to allow a better looking non removable back cover. Its durability is great for normal use but it won't do a thing when you drop your phone. It seems as if many think it makes the phone indestructible but what are you doing to your phone? I have real Kevlar gloves made by Galls but those aren't indestructible.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
EXACTLY! People who think the kevlar on this phone is magic that makes it nearly indestructable don't understand physics or how kevlar works.
People really are overselling the virtures of the kevlar implemented on this phone.
ProcessorThe Motorola X8 is the branding for the system-on-a-chip in the new Droid phones, but the processor is (according to Ars Technica) a slight variation of a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro, which was featured in several high-end handsets in late 2012.
that is because kevlar is used in bullet proof vests and it can take a bullet from a m9 to a small assult rifle such as the M4 Carbine
Yep, but that means nothing on a cell phone. It's all marketing speak, it looks good and makes for a nice buzzword when talking about the features, but it adds no level of durability to the phone.