When they are ready they will be pushed 

I agree, it makes way more sense to push the update when it's ready than trying to hit an arbitrary date and regularly missing. Microsoft still does patch tuesday, I think. But obviously that's not for mobile phones.Well, it makes sense ... It puts unnecessary pressure on them and just makes all us tech nerds angry when they miss the "deadline". I'd rather them set a goal of the update being stable and ready for the masses rather than meeting a certain day of the month because they said they would. Plus, prior to Googs doing this whole first Monday thing I'm not aware of any other manufacturer providing a guaranteed day they'd send updates.
The frustration I think all us tech nerds have is the lack of communication regarding updates, especially if there's a delay. I mean, how hard would it be to post something real quick along the lines of:
"Our team is currently working on the [insert build here] and we've discovered some issues. We're working hard to get to get a stable release pushed as soon as possible."
Or
"October security update won't be pushed. It will be combined with November's security patch"
Just simple lines of communication (from all manufacturers) would be nice and in today's day and age really isn't that difficult!
That's actually realism, not pessimism. Anyone who actually thinks Google cares about their users is kidding themselves.From face value, that's a good thing. However, I don't believe Google is making decisions based on the consumer and making them for themselves. So my take is that this allows then to avoid the negative feedback when updates were delayed and now they can just push them wherever.
Pessimistic, I know, but Google is doing what's best for Google, not us.
What it comes down to is that they can give the updates and patches a lower priority.That's actually realism, not pessimism. Anyone who actually thinks Google cares about their users is kidding themselves.