OK review, but somewhat subjective. I was especially disappointed with his approach to comparing the speed of both units, that he relied on watching a video game app that ran for milliseconds, and loading a couple of browser pages, then assumed hat the EVO would have slightly beat the DX if it didn't process Flash. He didn't use any objective processing and graphics speed tests, such as Phil has done in recent reviews, which would have clearly shown a distinct speed advantage to the DX.
I also thought that the camera still comparisons were pretty meaningless without including full scale files for AB comparison. In every full scale picture I've looked at so far, the EVO seems to be doing some kind of edge enhancement processing.