What Do You Guys Think About The New Design?

[mgm0918]

http://www.androidcentral.com/all-t...-smile-about?utm_source=ac&utm_medium=twitter

Seems like they didn't change as much as they did on the Galaxy S but still, it still doesn't have as sleek a design as the Euro Version.

What do you guys think about the new Sprint design? I actually kind of like it. The more rounded corners aren't as sleek as the original but it's not that bad.

 

[Officerpolabear]

As long as it's still thin, I will get it.

 

[bhem]

I like the look of the ATT version. The Sprint version looks very similar to the shape of the Evo 4G IMO, which is not a bad thing, but I'd prefer it to look like the original design

 

[shingi_70]

Not a fan of the tmobile version. I prefer the Sharp square edges.

 

[dkotoric]

ya prefer att version best then sprint and then tmobile

 

[sndplace]

I like the T-Mobile Design. Nice rounded edges just looks sexy. But I'm a Sprint man and will love Their GSII... As OPBear posted , as long as its still thin and sporting the Eynos chipset.

 

[Slingbox]

Please please Eynos chip

 

[ufergus]

I am just happy they brought back the search button. I must be the only person that uses it.

 

[sndplace]

I am just happy they brought back the search button. I must be the only person that uses it.

lol I personally don't... when i want to look for something i just start typing and it searches itself... like that its there but never really used it...

 

[freddyc]

New images to make the wait a lil' more difficult ...

Samsung Epic 4G Touch (Sprint): First Press Shots

 

[androidpirate]

New images to make the wait a lil' more difficult ...

Samsung Epic 4G Touch (Sprint): First Press Shots

looks like there's no dedicated camera button unless i'm mistaken.

 

[dc1225]

All three Galaxy S II's together is something to smile about | Android Central

Seems like they didn't change as much as they did on the Galaxy S but still, it still doesn't have as sleek a design as the Euro Version.

What do you guys think about the new Sprint design? I actually kind of like it. The more rounded corners aren't as sleek as the original but it's not that bad.

UGH, I hate it. Why do they have to fugly the phone down, I don't get it. I think it looks Fugly. I personally like the ATT's look the best. It looks thinner and longer. Sprint's look like $50 phone that's been out for 2 years already.

 

[Phenom]

I definitely like the Euro version better than any of the US variants. Sadly, almost all US Android slab phones look exactly the same. This one is no different. But for the size & the specs I'll get it and be happy. But aesthetically, it's not much different than my EVO.

 

[JayWill]

UGH, I hate it. Why do they have to fugly the phone down, I don't get it. I think it looks Fugly. I personally like the ATT's look the best. It looks thinner and longer. Sprint's look like $50 phone that's been out for 2 years already.

Haha awesome. It never ceases to amaze me how different people can have such different reactions to the look of something. This is not a knock on you by the way ... I fully appreciate everyone's opinion and personal taste. It's just funny how two people can look at the same thing, with reactions being polar opposites.

I've watched several of the hands on videos from the launch event now, and the AT&T version definitely looks a bit more sleek, due to less width. It's basically exactly the size of the International version, which makes sense as they already have a 4.5" Samsung phone. But it's not noticeably thinner, and only the reduced width makes it look longer, but it's definitely not.

My personal taste says 4" is the screen size sweet spot for smart phones. It won't stop me from buying a device with a bigger screen, but I do prefer something closer to 4".

 

[dc1225]

Haha awesome. It never ceases to amaze me how different people can have such different reactions to the look of something. This is not a knock on you by the way ... I fully appreciate everyone's opinion and personal taste. It's just funny how two people can look at the same thing, with reactions being polar opposites.

I've watched several of the hands on videos from the launch event now, and the AT&T version definitely looks a bit more sleek, due to less width. It's basically exactly the size of the International version, which makes sense as they already have a 4.5" Samsung phone. But it's not noticeably thinner, and only the reduced width makes it look longer, but it's definitely not.

My personal taste says 4" is the screen size sweet spot for smart phones. It won't stop me from buying a device with a bigger screen, but I do prefer something closer to 4".

This is prime example of why euro's call us "stupid americans". We're always outdone by euros and japs when it comes to "aesthetics". Sprint's/tmobile version is a god dam Buick/Chevy, meanwhile ATT got the Acura/Lexus and Euro's got the Beamer/Mercedes.

 

[jfenton]

Personally I could care less what others think of my phones looks and I sure don't care as long as it does what I need it to do.

 

[goitsme48]

Definitely AT&T since that is the closest to euro/asian version. Sprint and T-mo are just too wide (2.75") as opposed to 2.6' which is the sweet spot.. Wish Sprint had the ATT version...
Will wait to see what iPhone 5 has to offer... better be atleast 4" screen else keep googling for the next "big" one.

 

[foogle]

Since the Sprint version's dimension pretty similar to the existing ATT Infuse 4G, I stopped by the ATT store today to check it out. Yeah, it's definitely very wide. I do wish the Sprint version is like the ATT version, that would be the perfect size for me. But I will still get the Sprint version though since it's much better than the phone available in Sprint.

 

[James Wang]

I would be fine with all of them and i'm very happy with the way sprint's looks. plus we have LED YEAAA