Why does Samsung show only Head SAR value?

[Anil Joshi1]

When many well known mobile companies are showing the SAR (radiation) values for Head & Body both, Samsung is surprisingly showing only Head SAR values. Why is that so? In many cases I have found that Body SAR value is higher than Head SAR value. In that case, not reporting Body SAR value by Samsung does not give a good message to people who are concerned about the radiation levels.
Can someone throw light on this please?

 

[belodion]

When many well known mobile companies are showing the SAR (radiation) values for Head & Body both, Samsung is surprisingly showing only Head SAR values. Why is that so? In many cases I have found that Body SAR value is higher than Head SAR value. In that case, not reporting Body SAR value by Samsung does not give a good message to people who are concerned about the radiation levels.
Can someone throw light on this please?

Welcome.

I’ll move your question to one of the Samsung forums - oh, let’s say the Note 8 - where there may be users of Samsung devices, and furthermore, ones who know the answer.

 

[Anil Joshi1]

Guys no answers?? Please reply.

 

[bhappy11]

I found this link about SAR levels for the note.

https://www.rfsafe.com/phone/samsung-galaxy-note-8-0/

It shows head level. .34kw and body .93kw

Actually seems lower than most phones.

 

[Anil Joshi1]

So even in your reply body level SAR is higher. So why does Samsung not report the same?

 

[boudicca00]

I'm guessing no one knows. Perhaps see if someone on xda developers knows?

 

[JHBThree]

So even in your reply body level SAR is higher. So why does Samsung not report the same?

Maybe because the radiation levels are so low that it's irrelevant and every reputable study shows no correlation between cell phone radiation and cancer?