No. I gave up the DNA and KEPT the S3. The S3 is more compact. Battery is pretty decent - not quite as good as the DNA. Display is just as good. DNA is faster, but the S3 is very fast. You cannot add storage to the DNA - you can with the S3. Yeah yeah yeah, cloud blah blah blah security blah blah blah. Don't want to hear it. I want my data local and if I lose my phone I have a lot more problems than the data on the phone which is backed up anyway. Besides, the Asian version has a Micro SD slot - I'm not buying that they can't put it in or that it's somehow better for us without it - it's saving HTC a few bucks on each unit sold and that's the reason it's not there, period. All other reasons are marketing spin. The biggest thing I found though was that the S3 is more stable than the DNA. Weird things happen from time to time on the DNA that don't happen on the S3 - for instance launchers losing settings, requiring me to go back and reset them. Some apps do not display correctly on the DNA which do on the S3. I just find the S3 a better phone in daily use. I could have put up with the hardware, but the inconsistent stability of the DNA kinda drove me nuts. That was a shame - it's a great phone with a minor mental disorder, whereas the S3 is just plain great.
Of course that meant I only had two phones, so I had to replace the DNA with something. Turned out to be the Note 2, which lands tomorrow (just in time for a road trip!). I started using Samsung with the 5" Player, which was and remains a wonderful mini-tablet. The the S3 is the Player, but with phone and mobile data and a much better display. I think the Note will be an even better one.