Sorry, wasn't trying to troll. I actually updated my post to remove the "crappy" part. I am genuinely asking the question. I am used to flashing/homebrew on webOS and have no problem with it, except that on Android it voids the warranty, whereas with webOS, it did not. I made the jump to Android based on Matias Duarte being hired at Google to work on Android and because I "heard" that Nexus devices were to receive updates quickly. I would much preferred the HTC Rezound over this device if I had known I wouldn't be receiving updates. The Rezound seems better in nearly every category. I chose the GN so that I wouldn't have to root to have the latest builds.
The Rezound is a nice phone. Its physical aesthetic is tired and boring IMO, but it's a nice device with your typical outstanding specs regardless of that deformity. But like anything, this stuff is so brutally subjective (to a certain degree) that it's hard to say what's better, what's bad, etc.
Google has never said the Galaxy Nexus will receive quick updates. Verizon has never said it either. There was a brouhaha earlier concerning the CDMA hardware and possible difficulties, which is an easy but probably insufficient reason to explain the delay.
Also, with regards to the warranty, the legal parlance on the phone's bootloader uses the word "may," which of course means it is voidable, not void. This might be a semantic point to others, but in reality it means that Verizon must actually elect to void your warranty--which they very well might do. If it said it WILL void your phone, that means, theoretically, the warranty term/contract does not and never has existed as a legal agreement between you and the servicer.
Plus, you can unroot and relock it in like 3 minutes. Trust me, I've unwillingly became an expert at that. :-\
Also, Duarte has nothing to do with updating. He's design, not infrastructure or anything else like that--unless they've put him out of his wheelhouse, which would be mindlessly stupid IMHO.