What are your thoughts on the comparison between these two phones.
I have some unanswered questions.
The DNA comes with only about 2000 mAh battery (vs 3100 for the Note II) that is not removable? Why would they do that?
The DNA takes no SD cards, but does come with 16 gig drive.
Although the DNA supposed to have a 1080P screen, the App icons and function icons still look normal size. How's this done? Do the Icons resize themselves based on screen size?
I am looking at both of these phones, and the battery fiasco on the DNA is not winning me over. And I don't care if it has wireless charging, because you still have to charge it often. Having such high end features on a non-removable relative normal charge battery is puzzling.
I have some unanswered questions.
The DNA comes with only about 2000 mAh battery (vs 3100 for the Note II) that is not removable? Why would they do that?
The DNA takes no SD cards, but does come with 16 gig drive.
Although the DNA supposed to have a 1080P screen, the App icons and function icons still look normal size. How's this done? Do the Icons resize themselves based on screen size?
I am looking at both of these phones, and the battery fiasco on the DNA is not winning me over. And I don't care if it has wireless charging, because you still have to charge it often. Having such high end features on a non-removable relative normal charge battery is puzzling.