1. Argelius1's Avatar
    I'm considering (but just considering at this point) replacing my Samsung Galaxy S3 with the Motorola Razr MAXX HD, primarily because the battery life on the S3 is beyond pathetic.

    When I was in the Verizon store taking a look at it I saw that, unlike the S3, the Android "buttons" (home, back, menu) on the Razr are part of the actual display area (whereas on the S3 the home button is physical and the back and menu buttons are capacitive touch buttons in the bezel and not part of the display).

    This made the screen area on the Razr look noticeably smaller that the S3. Am I imaging this, or is this just a reality of the button placement?

    Thanks.
    01-27-2013 04:29 PM
  2. PowrDroid's Avatar
    I'm considering (but just considering at this point) replacing my Samsung Galaxy S3 with the Motorola Razr MAXX HD, primarily because the battery life on the S3 is beyond pathetic.

    When I was in the Verizon store taking a look at it I saw that, unlike the S3, the Android "buttons" (home, back, menu) on the Razr are part of the actual display area (whereas on the S3 the home button is physical and the back and menu buttons are capacitive touch buttons in the bezel and not part of the display).

    This made the screen area on the Razr look noticeably smaller that the S3. Am I imaging this, or is this just a reality of the button placement?

    Thanks.
    Yes, the capacitive touch buttons are a part of the screen real estate. However, most apps that use the screen for video purposes, i.e. YouTube, most games, and others 'take over' that part of the screen so you end up using the entire screen.

    One of the (many) things that I didn't like about the S3 was the physical home key. I'm happy with touch buttons on the RMHD.
    Argelius1 likes this.
    01-27-2013 04:59 PM
  3. Argelius1's Avatar
    I like the S3 (my first Android after years of iPhones). My only complaints are the battery life (horrible) and that the power and volume buttons are too easily triggered.
    01-27-2013 05:02 PM
  4. Who?'s Avatar
    You're not imagining it. It just doesn't matter, though. If you want massive screen real estate that's actually usable, you'd get a Note 2.
    01-28-2013 10:49 PM
  5. Megaroad's Avatar
    Yeah, for most apps you have less screen space. On the other hand, though, the on-screen navbar is functionally better. For one thing, you can swipe up from Home for Google Now. They are also easier to reach, and I think they are less prone to accidental presses. And they are mod-able in theory, while hardware buttons obviously aren't. I thought they were a drawback at first, but now I like them.
    Who? and Argelius1 like this.
    01-29-2013 11:06 AM

Similar Threads

  1. HTC One X vs Samsung Galaxy S3
    By saintforlife in forum HTC One X
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 03-05-2013, 05:49 AM
  2. Battery Life: Maxx vs. Maxx HD
    By Anonymous7532479 in forum Droid RAZR HD
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-10-2012, 03:26 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-28-2012, 04:35 AM
  4. Weird issue with rooted Galaxy S3--suddenly getting a Samsung "custom unlock" screen on boot
    By Defcon One in forum Verizon Galaxy S III Rooting, ROM's, and Hack's
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-20-2012, 11:36 AM
  5. Razr Maxx and HTC Tbolt for Samsung S3 VZW
    By BryanTheRed in forum Marketplace Archive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-31-2012, 07:50 PM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD