I still don't get how Google's staggered release (especially when it seems to disregard location, time zone or any other obvioums criteria) is either better for the consumer or, when issues arise, in the long run better for Google. With an Apple all-at-once release, while everyone then shares the pain of a colossal [removed by moderator] up, at least then Apple knows that it is their issue to fix. With Google, a staggered release where one person may not get an update but a co-worker does, its got to hard to track, when an issue occurs (as it did with 5), whether its with a dodgy servers, corrupted downloads, a series of bad installs or...? And no user should feel the need to 'sideload' and manually install an OS in order to remain recent.
Staggered installs look more like a capability issue on Google's part or, worse, an effort to limit bad PR. Neither one is good for the consumer and only frustrates them - wondering what the heck is going on.