The 3D is not that superior then my EVO 4G. I purchased the 3D at launch day @ 8am and returned it the same day @ 7:30pm. The speed wasn't that noticeable and don't let me get started on the 3D (gimick or what). If it wasn't for the 3D what is actually sparkling the flame for this phone?? Also I know both phones are 4.3" but the 4G screen is wider then the 3D?? I'll use my upgrade for something more deserving.
I couldn't disagree more. The speed is the most noticeable improvement. After having the EVO for most of the last year along with most of the hot phones Sprint(for trial periods) had I can say if it's not HTC the over all quality wasn't there.
IMHO, the screen is much better, RAM, did I mention speed, the size for holding in the hand is an improvement and sense 3.0. When you have Android, the phones are very similar. Build quality and developer community for HTC is second to none.
Sure Samsung and Motorola have very nice phones coming out but they never hold up for the long haul. For example, from personal experience, the Droid X and Samsung Epic both nice phones but their updates and developer community aren't there. The software on each is a big drawback to the standard user I have seen both phones struggle with everyday use. The original EVO runs circles around both. I know there are people out there that love those phones but I see more trouble than not when compared to HTC.
Sprint's latest sales pitch is "first". That is why the 3D thing is plastered everywhere. Sure it's gimmicky but it works. If you are buying this for just 3D then you will be disappointed.
I am interest in the Galaxy S2 but only time will tell.
Again this is my opinion and my opinion only.