benjamminh
Well-known member
Uh, maybe that's because the HTC10 screen is 5.2", and the two droids are 5.5"? I agree the bottom chin is too big and capacitive buttons would at least use that space.
The Z actually has a better body to screen ratio than the HTC 10, but that does have dual front speakers. The Force is slightly worse, because of its shatter shield construction.
It depends on battery level. If you turn on efficiency mode and your phone is less than 80%, the mod will charge the phone to 80% and the phone stays there by simply using the mod as it's power source until it drains. If your phone is 80-99%, the phone will charge to 100% and the phone stays there, again by simply using the mod as it's power source instead of the internal battery. If you are already at 100%, then the phone will simply use the mod as its power source no matter what setting it's used on. The mod works similarly to an adaptive fast charger, like Motorola's own turbo charger, where the phpne charges, then once at 100%, the phone simply starts using the charger as its power source instead of the internal battery... only the mod doesn't charge very fast. But because the phone uses the mod's battery when at 100%, the mod can therefore be used as an extension of the phone's battery, so it's as if you have a 4,820 mAh battery instead of a case or pack that simply charges the phone.Veteater - do you know if there is any way to customize the efficiency mode of the battery mod? I'd rather the mod kick in at something other than 80%.
Neither have dual front speakers. The Z has a front speaker, and the 10 has a front speaker (tweeter) and a large bottom speaker (woofer). Both have fingerprint scanners at the bottom; the 10 has more top bezel, the Z has more bottom bezel, and the 10 has slightly more side bezel, because it's a smaller device and it can. So it just about balances out, both have about a 72% screen-to-body ratio.The Z actually has a better body to screen ratio than the HTC 10, but that does have dual front speakers. The Force is slightly worse, because of its shatter shield construction.
But the 10 feels heavier. But that was a Z w/O mod vs 10. W/mod or force I dunno.Neither have dual front speakers. The Z has a front speaker, and the 10 has a front speaker (tweeter) and a large bottom speaker (woofer). Both have fingerprint scanners at the bottom; the 10 has more top bezel, the Z has more bottom bezel, and the 10 has slightly more side bezel, because it's a smaller device and it can. So it just about balances out, both have about a 72% screen-to-body ratio.
W/battery mod the Z feels AMAZING in hand, almost to Moto X 2014 levels of good, with the added thickness and curve, and feels like it has a good weight, while not too heavy. I don't know exactly how much weight it adds to the phone. The force is definitely a more girth phone than the Z, and feels heavy in comparison, though it is not particularly heavy either. If you want a flagship Moto but don't care about mods (other than, maybe, style shells) then the Z force is the way to go, and currently one of the best all-round phones on the entire market. The Z is better for someone like me, who wants an extremely thin phone that could be used with Moto mods, and the user can choose between the two. I already have a very powerful bluetooth speaker, and I don't need a projector, so if I get a Z (serious consideration right now) my accessories would simply be a bumper, so the frame of the phone doesn't get all scuffed up, and the battery mod, so that I have a phone with a huge battery that feels good in hand. Price isn't such a big issue since I would simply get a Z on a trade in discount if I were to get one.But the 10 feels heavier. But that was a Z w/O mod vs 10. W/mod or force I dunno.
•SPEAKER TEST•W/battery mod the Z feels AMAZING in hand, almost to Moto X 2014 levels of good, with the added thickness and curve, and feels like it has a good weight, while not too heavy. I don't know exactly how much weight it adds to the phone. The force is definitely a more girth phone than the Z, and feels heavy in comparison, though it is not particularly heavy either. If you want a flagship Moto but don't care about mods (other than, maybe, style shells) then the Z force is the way to go, and currently one of the best all-round phones on the entire market. The Z is better for someone like me, who wants an extremely thin phone that could be used with Moto mods, and the user can choose between the two. I already have a very powerful bluetooth speaker, and I don't need a projector, so if I get a Z (serious consideration right now) my accessories would simply be a bumper, so the frame of the phone doesn't get all scuffed up, and the battery mod, so that I have a phone with a huge battery that feels good in hand. Price isn't such a big issue since I would simply get a Z on a trade in discount if I were to get one.
Would people comment on how fluidly the phone performs? I have read a few people say it's the quickest, most fluid phone they've used. Anandtech's review using all those synthetic tests indicated that the Moto Z/Z Force are probably the fastest Android phones right now (they hadn't tested the Note 7).
That has been my experience so far. I have had all the major Flagships minus the G5 and the Axon 7. The Moto Z is definitely the most fluid device I have had so far. The OP3 was very fast but even the Z beats it. Very impressed so far. I haven't tried the Note 7 yet and I am looking forward to what the V20 brings however. I'm undecided if I'll get the next Nexus device also. It has been a pretty good year so far for cell phones. All of them are pretty well done.Would people comment on how fluidly the phone performs? I have read a few people say it's the quickest, most fluid phone they've used. Anandtech's review using all those synthetic tests indicated that the Moto Z/Z Force are probably the fastest Android phones right now (they hadn't tested the Note 7).
I understand your concern. While the Z droid has a solid front-facing speaker, it is a bit behind the Droid Turbo 2, its predecessor, in audio quality, due to the fact that it is quieter by a bit and lacks bass compared to the Turbo 2, although mids and treble are very good on the Z's speaker. However, when you compare the Z droid to the Moto X Pure, it's no contest. The X Pure wrecks the Z and wrecks the Turbo 2. But then again, it has stereo speakers, and very good ones at that. So obviously the Pure has louder sound, and the sound quality out of it is amazing, and since you are used to a phone with such good audio quality, it makes perfect sense you are disappointed in the Z droid's audio quality, and frankly you should be, coming from a phone with such beastly audio. I have listened to music on a Pure, but have not done a detailed review on one. If I were to do one, the X Pure would probably do about as good in the test as the HTC 10. I would not go for the mod, as much as I like it and as convenient (and nice-sounding) as it is, but I think I'll stick to my Bluetooth speakers. While it is worth it, I wouldn't buy it. It seems to me like you are on Verizon, so my recommendation to you, if you want a phone that matches or beats the audio quality of your X Pure, and is very good at everything else, then I would go for the HTC 10. Right now, it is between the HTC 10 and the Moto Z for me.@Veteater,
I appreciate your opinion on the Z's speakers. I really appreciate decent sound quality on my phones. Not a headphone guy because I need to hear what's going on around me. I was a bit disappointed with the Z's speaker sound. Kinda lackluster although this was in store. I currently have the MXPE and it sounds great as we know. The speaker mod isn't going to do what I need on a daily basis. It's more of a slap it on in the garage for good tunes while your working on your car type mod IMO. So, I'm hoping my X holds out a bit longer.