Ten Four
Well-known member
Seems like a company could face some serious liability if they flipped a kill switch on a phone. Imagine what might have happened if someone caught in Hurricane Matthew flooding suddenly had their phone deactivated?
Seems like a company could face some serious liability if they flipped a kill switch on a phone. Imagine what might have happened if someone caught in Hurricane Matthew flooding suddenly had their phone deactivated?
They did the same to me. I've pre ordered my next phone.Just got off with Verizon. They voided my device payment plan, returned my my down payment, and told me to not return the phone to them either at the store or shipped.
Anyway I went with a Black Onyx S7 to hold me over. I hate the excessive curve on the S7 Edge as it leads to too many accidental touches (the curve on the Note 7 was perfect...like everything else unfortunately). I'm fully invested in wireless chargers and need the SD card and Gear VR functionality as those were freebies . Figured I can upgrade to the Note 8 next year...if not the S8 Edge sooner but only if they make the curve similar to the Note 7!
People keep mentioning that Samsung rushed the delivery of the Note 7. The Note 5 was released on 8-21-15 and the Note 7 was released on 8-19-16, how is that rushed? Most phone carriers target the same time frame every year and that's what Samsung did, were their a bunch of reports saying that Samsung did rush it?
No, not asserting that. Just noticed that the comment has been brought up quite a few times that they rushed to get the phone to the market but it's almost exactly 1 year to the day of the release of the prior version. I was curious as of to why people thought samsung rushed the phone.Are you asserting that Samsung did everything right and still botched it up? I don't know which is worse.
No, not asserting that. Just noticed that the comment has been brought up quite a few times that they rushed to get the phone to the market but it's almost exactly 1 year to the day of the release of the prior version. I was curious as of to why people thought samsung rushed the phone.
I doubt this even happened. Just speculation. It's the same time as last year. That's normal.D.J. Koh chose to accelerate the launch of a new phone due to rumors that the iPhone 7 was an iterative update - according to people close to the subject. The internet is crawling with anecdotal evidence of this (starting with Bloomberg), however I doubt Mr. Koh is going to step up publicly and claim personal responsibility.
I doubt this even happened. Just speculation. It's the same time as last year. That's normal.
I'm going with they didn't have th QA in place or some version of that. Think about it, they called themselves fixing it and it's STILL not fixed. They have no clue what the problem is, it seems, and some reports have said that they've been unable to reproduce the problem. So I think even if it were released 2 months from now, the same thing would have happened. I don't buy the rushed thing. Just my opinion though.So then it's up to the individual to discern which is more likely:
- Samsung fast tracked production to time a pre-iphone/pixel launch?
- (or) Samsung didn't have the requisite safeguards in place to prevent QA/QC issues in a fully incubated product?
The business decision to compress schedules for a competitive advantage seems more plausible to me than a company with mature and developed processes for QA/QC let something slip through sans external timeline pressure.
That pressure could have simply been an attempt to keep cadence with previous release cycles.
By not returning the phone, what message are you sending to Samsung ?
That a device subject to recall due to a potentially dangerous defect is good enough for you ?
Papa dont preach ... I have made up mind, im keeping my Galaxy Note 7 baby lol
for sure
Just talked to sprint. They won't cut off service but still suggest I return my phoneIs there a chance that sprint/verizon/tmobile etc will block network access for the n7?
No, not asserting that. Just noticed that the comment has been brought up quite a few times that they rushed to get the phone to the market but it's almost exactly 1 year to the day of the release of the prior version. I was curious as of to why people thought samsung rushed the phone.
Just because the Note 5 took less than a year does not mean the Note 7 was not rushed. They clearly missed something in their testing. Lithium-Ion is dangerous stuff. A new battery design needs a lot of real world tests. I agree with the others, it the problem is not that it was rushed then there are other major issues with Samsung's testing.
Would a multi-billion dollar company with highly trained and experienced engineers make the same mistake twice?
I doubt it.
I DO KNOW that less than one half of 1 percent have been affected, therefore im not gonna bash Samsung for not catching it.
I think it is more they have poor quality control.People keep mentioning that Samsung rushed the delivery of the Note 7. The Note 5 was released on 8-21-15 and the Note 7 was released on 8-19-16, how is that rushed? Most phone carriers target the same time frame every year and that's what Samsung did, were their a bunch of reports saying that Samsung did rush it?