billykac
Well-known member
- Dec 15, 2012
- 1,339
- 0
- 36
Hi, I'm the developer of Doze and ShutApp. Thank you all for discussing Doze here and I want to say something:
1. For unrooted devices, VPN is the only way to block data. So this is one of those things we (or any others) have no alternative.
2. In Google's Doze mode, network access is blocked; wake lock is ignored; alarms are suspended. While our Doze just blocks data flow.
In most cases, however, apps cannot do anything without network connection. We can reach the same result in both ways.
3. Why we developed Doze app even though all of us know Android 6 has the new feature?
Google's Doze is a very nice feature but it's too hard to get into the mode. Imagine a day I'm hanging out and I'm walking all the way, I can't get into Google's Doze then. In my point of view, that's one of the cases that we need battery lasting as long as possible. That's why we develop Doze that needs to set up VPN and develop other features like active list, aggressive mode, Charge/Wi-Fi preferred mode...
20% of our user base for Doze app are Android 6.0 users. It says that our Doze works better than Google's Doze for them.
4. Great to see that we have similar apps like dozzzer app, with whom we share the same purpose - battery saving. Battery performance is always a problem for Android system, and we hope that Google can do something and make a world without battery saving apps.
Thanks!
It's awesome that we have the Devs of two leading apps weighing-in here.
For me, I'd still like my unanswered question addressed - security and privacy.
If I am running a VPN locally, especially a VPN instance initiated by an app developed by 3rd party Dev, aren't there additional inherent risks here? Isn't all of my traffic being routed through a new single point inserted in my data transmission path that can monitor or alter my data?
Just trying to figure out how much security/privacy exposure I want to incur.