You can't really compare the battery life of the iPhone 6 plus to the s6. You have to compare the regular iPhone 6 battery
Posted via the Android Central App
@emad1995 ... I'm only quoting your post because it's readily available, but my below comments are not directed specifically at you ... they are directed in general to the whole idea of how we compare phones around here.
First off, I totally understand that not all devices are created equal, and that some relativity in comparisons has to be used. That said, this whole business of "you can't compare this phone to that phone" is ridiculous as often as that is said around here. What people are generally comparing is the EXPERIENCE of using one phone vs. another. In this case, it's the iPhone 6+ vs. the GS6. Yes, the 6+ has a larger battery and "lesser" display ... but as others have said, what we are really comparing is two flagship devices that are at the same basic price point. I think that's a way more than fair comparison. ie: you can buy one phone or the other with the same hit to your wallet, and should be getting roughly the same experience of usability and screen time, etc.
Long story short on the above is, Samsung made some decisions to go with a smaller battery and better display on the S6 ... and if that's inherently going to cause the battery to drain more quickly than "comparable" devices, then I personally find that to be a bad choice on Samsung's part. They chose a slimmer design for aesthetics vs. a slightly (VERY slightly) thicker design for better function. At least, that's how I see it.
Now, on to one of the main issues we seem to discuss over and over here. Apple has somehow found a way to have their phones (with less ram and a less powerful processor) to run longer and more fluidly than most android devices - and this is withOUT having to "manage" your phone's settings for things like location, wifi on/off, bluetooth on/off, so on and so forth. I'm not tech savvy enough to know what the deal is, but it baffles my mind from a common sense standpoint that the "comparable" android phones are not ALL getting the same basic performance from the battery, and the same basic fluidity from multi-tasking & app switching. And please, I don't need an explanation of how what Android does is with multi-tasking/app-switching/whatever is different technically than what Apple phones do. To 99% of users out there, they all "do" the same thing. You open an app, switch to another app, then switch back, etc. The background apps should all come up right where they left off, on all these phones, period. Whether it means the app was floating solely in the RAM, of if it was written to a cache to be reloaded later, I dont know, and I don't care. The point is, all these flagship phones SHOULD do that effortlessly.
The other thing is, when comparing the apple phones to the android phones (or iOS to Android) is a lot of talk of customization. I can't argue with that. Apple has their stuff locked down pretty good. But, the benefit is, a typically smoother running phone, and most all the apps they give you to use are as good as what else is out there. You can debate the lack of being able to customize the look of your messaging app, but in the end, as long as it handles SMS/MMS properly, allows you to easily see the conversation, etc... then there really isn't a problem. The only thing left is "Hey, I'd rather my message bubbles be color X for incoming, and color Y for my own. That has very little if anything to do with functionality, unless the stock colors are so similar and the layout of the app is so screwy that it's hard to read.
Now, I'm not here promoting apple/iOS, or dogging Android. I LOVE my S6, and can't see me switching back to an Apple phone. There are just too many things I like about Android vs iOS. But the point of this thread is comparing one phone/system to another... and it's a very valid comparison if you ask me.
I still think the only real problem with the S6 that cannot be solved via software updates and bug fixes is the battery ... you can talk all you want about 5.1.1 coming out, but the battery is going to be the same exact size then as it is now. There might be slight improvements in battery life, but if you are expecting 5.1.1 to change your SOT from 4-5 hours up to 9 hours, I hope you're not holding your breath. Samsung SHOULD have made the phone thicker to put close to a 3500mAh battery in there, which would have barely increased thickness of the phone, and made the effective depth of the camera bezel smaller - both of which would have been GREAT improvements.