raino
Q&A Team
- Nov 18, 2012
- 649
- 0
- 0
I can't think of any carrier that doesn't do this (present themselves as something they aren't)
But none of them calls themselves the 'Un'carrier

I can't think of any carrier that doesn't do this (present themselves as something they aren't)
But none of them calls themselves the 'Un'carrier![]()
But none of them calls themselves the 'Un'carrier![]()
My dog makes free gift everyday, you interested in that? About the same usefulness as the crap T-Mobile will be handing out going forward.May have been an MLB thing wanting to change that so people can't stack them. Either way .. really hard to complain about free things.
My dog makes free gift everyday, you interested in that? About the same usefulness as the crap T-Mobile will be handing out going forward.![]()
It's quite simple to avoid the "crap"--just don't install the app.
One of the freebies was 1 share of T-Mobile stock, which is currently at around $43. So they essentially gave me $43. Is your dog pooping out money, too?![]()
Apparently, the TMO server is getting slammed (again,) but hey...at least that's free. Uncarrier.
Precisely.But none of them calls themselves the 'Un'carrier![]()
Indeed. I don' t need free streaming from selected partners, free movies, pizza or stock in TMO. What I need is solid coverage and a selection of affordable devices with which to take advantage of it.My dog makes free gift everyday, you interested in that? About the same usefulness as the crap T-Mobile will be handing out going forward.![]()
Wonderful. Happy for you. But getting a free VUDO movie rental once-a-week or whatever is not why I sign up with a mobile carrier. I sign up with a mobile carrier for... wait for it...I disagree. I like the VUDU movie rental. Been using that each week and sending it to my Chromecast.
Wonderful. Happy for you. But getting a free VUDO movie rental once-a-week or whatever is not why I sign up with a mobile carrier. I sign up with a mobile carrier for... wait for it...
Mobile service!
That means that, ideally, I can go pretty much wherever I want to go and have service. But that isn't happening, for me, because TMO is concentrating more, lately, on flash-and-trash offers than on improving mobile service. My coverage is actually no better than it was when I first signed up about three years ago. Oh, it could be better--if I wanted to buy a TMO-branded phone that was all loaded-up with manufacturer and carrier... sorry, uncarrier cruft. Or a really expensive unlocked phone. But a decent, affordable, unlocked phone. Forget it: No extended LTE and no WiFi calling.
I guess I shouldn't complain. I can get free pizza, so that makes it all better.
And I get that but where did I say to sign up for T-Mobile simply for the free perks? This thread is talking about the free stuff they give away and that is what I was talking about. Not once did I say "sign up anyway regardless of service" did I?
I am a huge advocate for getting service that works for you. You think I would be with T-Mobile if they weren't excellent in my area? Nope. For me they are tied with Verizon in my area so .. I stay for a cheap bill / unlimited data but I wouldn't stay if it were horrible. I did that once with Sprint for a few months and I left due to not being able to stream things at all. So .. If they don't work simply switch. Why keep giving money if you hate them so much?
Precisely.
When TMO first started their series of "uncarrier" initiatives they were doing things that were truly un-carrier-like. Things such as actually encouraging BYOD. Data without exorbitant charges for going over, etc. But lately...? Yeah: Not so much.
Indeed. I don' t need free streaming from selected partners, free movies, pizza or stock in TMO. What I need is solid coverage and a selection of affordable devices with which to take advantage of it.
Wonderful. Happy for you. But getting a free VUDO movie rental once-a-week or whatever is not why I sign up with a mobile carrier. I sign up with a mobile carrier for... wait for it...
Mobile service!
That means that, ideally, I can go pretty much wherever I want to go and have service. But that isn't happening, for me, because TMO is concentrating more, lately, on flash-and-trash offers than on improving mobile service. My coverage is actually no better than it was when I first signed up about three years ago. Oh, it could be better--if I wanted to buy a TMO-branded phone that was all loaded-up with manufacturer and carrier... sorry, uncarrier cruft. Or a really expensive unlocked phone. But a decent, affordable, unlocked phone. Forget it: No extended LTE and no WiFi calling.
I guess I shouldn't complain. I can get free pizza, so that makes it all better.
That means that, ideally, I can go pretty much wherever I want to go and have service. But that isn't happening, for me, because TMO is concentrating more, lately, on flash-and-trash offers than on improving mobile service. My coverage is actually no better than it was when I first signed up about three years ago. Oh, it could be better--if I wanted to buy a TMO-branded phone that was all loaded-up with manufacturer and carrier... sorry, uncarrier cruft. Or a really expensive unlocked phone. But a decent, affordable, unlocked phone. Forget it: No extended LTE and no WiFi calling.
I didn't say you did and I didn't say I did. What I wrote was that their recent "uncarrier" initiatives are a big yawn for me.And I get that but where did I say to sign up for T-Mobile simply for the free perks?
...
Why keep giving them money if you hate them so much?
How do I know... what? That their network hasn't improved for me in the four years we've been with them? Uhm... because neither my wife nor I are experiencing any better coverage than we were four years ago?How do you know that?
It's a funny thing. Go to a TMO forum and bring up B12 and people will blame lack of B12, or, more accurately, VoLTE functionality on the device manufacturer. Go to a device manufacturer's forum and everybody blames it on TMO. (Qualification process too expensive and painstaking. TMO failure to provide fallback network coverage [2g/3g/HSPA].)They've been rolling out band 12 support in a lot of the regions where they needed to increase blanket coverage... which only helps if you have a phone that supports band 12. If you don't, that's your problem, not T-Mobile's.
You just wrote that they new B12 deployment provided the greatest bump, then write "VoLTE aside..." You can't have B12 enabled without qualifying VoLTE on their network. That's why the Moto G and other devices had their B12 support disabled.As for the phones... VoLTE and WiFi Calling aside, there are plenty of affordable, unlocked phones that fully support their network (phone + LTE bands).
That's the only one of which I know. I've been researching it for a couple weeks. The only one that's not riddled with manufacturer or carrier bloat, anyway.And if you wanted VoLTE and WFC, the Nexus 5X fully supports those.
I can if part of the reason they don't have better device support is the fact they've made it difficult, which is the impression the device manufacturers leave.You can't fault T-Mobile for service if you are using a phone that doesn't fully support their network.
Being truly uncarrier-ish would've been bending over backward to help devices makers get their devices qualified for VoLTE so they could take advantage of TMO's "extended LTE network." Instead "free pizza!"
True, but it also, originally, really was uncarrier-ish moves. Encouraging BYOD, when everbody else was discouraging it. Their roaming--incl. data. Their $10/mo. long-distance thing. Unlimited, throttled, but, unlimited data. Their prices.Uncarrier is just marketing hype machine. It's working, look at their customer satisfaction ratings.
No clue. And I don't even know whom to blame with any certainty. Like I said: TMO's comments imply it was manufacturers' choices, and do so in such a way as to imply "don't look at us--wasn't our choice." The device manufacturers imply it was due to TMO's onerous VoLTE certification process.I'm curious what TMo is charging for VoLTE testing and certification. Instead of jumping through T-Mobile's hoops, OEMs are just disabling Band 12.
I didn't say you did and I didn't say I did. What I wrote was that their recent "uncarrier" initiatives are a big yawn for me.
I can be annoyed with them, can I not?
No clue. And I don't even know whom to blame with any certainty. Like I said: TMO's comments imply it was manufacturers' choices, and do so in such a way as to imply "don't look at us--wasn't our choice." The device manufacturers imply it was due to TMO's onerous VoLTE certification process.
Even leaving B12 enabled, VoLTE-less, has two stories: TMO's side: "We didn't tell manufacturers they had to disable B12. They chose to. We merely recommended it." Manufacturers: "TMO told us to disable B12 if we weren't going to achieve their VoLTE certification."
Or, at least, those are the stories I've gleaned from what I've read. Problem is: Most of what's been said leaves one to assume a lot, because nobody wants to come right out and say "This is exactly who said what, and why."
Meanwhile the customers are left out in the cold.
Unless they want to buy new devices.
Again.