I have found my thunderbolt, which recently died, took better images that looked a lot more stable... not as blurry during rapid movement. However, the DNA takes photos MUCH faster. Maybe half a second to capture, save, and it's ready for next photo. Whereas even without photo preview enabled on the thunderbolt, it still took a good two seconds to ready itself again. That said however, I think the camera on the DNA consumes way more battery. Even off the charger all day, just taking two photos without flash will put the camera right below the display when listed for battery consumption.