Camera updates?

[Mike Dee]

Only acceptable?

It takes excellent pictures and exceptional zoom photos. It's only weakness is indoor low light photography for photos that have a lot of movement shot in auto. There are other modes you can use including manual settings to compensate.

 

[Lobwedgephil]

I have an Ultra and really like the zoom photos and still photos, still think the autofocus is slow and pictures of my kids and dogs are better on other phones to me. It is a camera that has gotten much better, but still a little disappointing.

 

[Mike Dee]

I have an Ultra and really like the zoom photos and still photos, still think the autofocus is slow and pictures of my kids and dogs are better on other phones to me. It is a camera that has gotten much better, but still a little disappointing.

As far as pictures of kids and dogs I don't think its any different than the S10 or Note 10.

 

[DUTCH VanAtlanta]

Acceptable, yes. Exceptional, no.

If I want excellent photos, I'll use either my Sony RX10IV or RX100VI. They take excellent photos.

 

[Kizzy Catwoman]

Funny cos since the camera upgrades my S10+ produces quite good photos when my cats are moving. When I first got the phone those types of photo were blurred and unusable.

 

[neil74]

As far as pictures of kids and dogs I don't think its any different than the S10 or Note 10.

I'd agree with this, this issue is totally down to Samsungs processing choices rather than hardware. This is my biggest frustration with them as hardware wise the S20 is likely up there with the very best.

 

[Morty2264]

Funny cos since the camera upgrades my S10+ produces quite good photos when my cats are moving. When I first got the phone those types of photo were blurred and unusable.

That's awesome! Moving pictures for me are still hit and miss, but I'm wondering about the user above me who stated it could be software-related. My Pixel 2 was a beast at processing imagery.