I saw the same review on Computer World by JR Raphael (who may be the most pro-chromebook tech blogger on the internet), and I was really disappointed by the performance and battery life of Samsung's new eight-core processor in the 13.3" version of the Samsung Chromebook 2. The non-IPS display also was a negative. I really, really wanted to buy this, but I think I'm going to pass. (Incidentally, I'm the guy named "CLM3Chip" in the comments for Computer World review article.)
You'd think it would be easy for OEMs to manufacture a true mid-level chromebook that has no or at least minimal compromises on about 7-8 key features (screen resolution, display, sound, battery life, real world speed, weight, and keyboard/trackpad quality), but you'd be wrong. As I noted in the review comments for the Computer World article, whoever manufactures the first true mid-level chromebook will clean up.
You'd think it would be easy for OEMs to manufacture a true mid-level chromebook that has no or at least minimal compromises on about 7-8 key features (screen resolution, display, sound, battery life, real world speed, weight, and keyboard/trackpad quality), but you'd be wrong. As I noted in the review comments for the Computer World article, whoever manufactures the first true mid-level chromebook will clean up.