E-mark cables?

[Serkle K]

It looks like a lot of the overlooked info to take full advantage of the 45watt charger is the difference in the cable being used. I'm trying to find the most reliable e-marked USB-C cables. I was trying to go with Anker, as I have a few of their products now, but I didn't see any info on their site about e-mark cables.

Anyone have any other recommendations?

 

[mgbosshogg]

Spigen do them on amazon.
£9 or so.

 

[Mooncatt]

The term "E-marked" only refers to having a chip in the cable to negotiate power and transfer speeds. It's a technical requirement for what you need, but not a marketing tool. What you need is a cable that is USB 3.1 Gen 2 (not Gen 1) compliant. This article covers the differences and also what logos you can look for to identify the correct cable when shopping.

https://www.logicsupply.com/company/io-hub/usb-type-c-and-usb-3-1-explained/

 

[miamiborn79]

The term "E-marked" only refers to having a chip in the cable to negotiate power and transfer speeds. It's a technical requirement for what you need, but not a marketing tool. What you need is a cable that is USB 3.1 Gen 2 (not Gen 1) compliant. This article covers the differences and also what logos you can look for to identify the correct cable when shopping.

https://www.logicsupply.com/company/io-hub/usb-type-c-and-usb-3-1-explained/

Would this be the same requirement to be able to charge at 25w with the stock charging brick? I'd like to get a longer cable but want to buy the right one.

 

[Serkle K]

The term "E-marked" only refers to having a chip in the cable to negotiate power and transfer speeds. It's a technical requirement for what you need, but not a marketing tool. What you need is a cable that is USB 3.1 Gen 2 (not Gen 1) compliant. This article covers the differences and also what logos you can look for to identify the correct cable when shopping.

https://www.logicsupply.com/company/io-hub/usb-type-c-and-usb-3-1-explained/

Yes, that's why I am looking for suggestions on which brands are compatible and reliable. As I stated, I was looking at Anker, but they dont seem to mention anything being e-mark chipped/compatible for PD devices.

 

[TheMiz]

Would this be the same requirement to be able to charge at 25w with the stock charging brick? I'd like to get a longer cable but want to buy the right one.

Also need a longer better cable.

 

[Mooncatt]

Yes, that's why I am looking for suggestions on which brands are compatible and reliable. As I stated, I was looking at Anker, but they dont seem to mention anything being e-mark chipped/compatible for PD devices.

I don't have a specific recommendation, so can only tell you how to identify the correct cable. My brand of choice in the past (Volutz) doesn't have a USB 3.1 Gen 2 cable yet, and I haven't used a device where that spec is usable.

You shouldn't look for anything labeled "e-marked" because that isn't a specific identifier. It only means it has a chip inside, which applies to earlier USB standards as well that would not be compatible with the 45W charger. If you do find someone advertising an e-marked cable, ignore that and look for the 3.1 Gen 2 spec listing or the logo with Superspeed+/10Gbps notations.

 

[Mooncatt]

Would this be the same requirement to be able to charge at 25w with the stock charging brick? I'd like to get a longer cable but want to buy the right one.

For compatibility reasons, I would say yes that would be ideal. USB 3.0/3.1 Gen 1 is only spec'd for 4.5W. Many cables do allow higher charge rates, as evidenced by the various Quick Charge style protocols out there, but it's not a guarantee.

 

[Serkle K]

I don't have a specific recommendation, so can only tell you how to identify the correct cable. My brand of choice in the past (Volutz) doesn't have a USB 3.1 Gen 2 cable yet, and I haven't used a device where that spec is usable.

You shouldn't find anything labeled "e-marked" because that isn't a specific identifier. It only means it has a chip inside, which applies to earlier USB standards as well that would not be compatible with the 45W charger. If you do find someone advertising an e-marked cable, ignore that and look for the 3.1 Gen 2 spec listing or the logo with Superspeed+/10Gbps notations.

Cool, thank you!

 

[DrRafaelPenguin]

I would also like to know this if someone could direct me which cord is the best to use. I was thinking of this one but not sure if it's compatible:

Anker PowerLine+ C to C 2.0 cable (6ft), High Durability, for USB Type-C Devices Including Samsung Galaxy Note 8 S8 S8+ S9, iPad Pro 2018, Google Pixel, Nexus 6P, Huawei Matebook, MacBook and More https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LNA0XC...ag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=UUacUvbUpU6616823

 

[Casper4]

This is the Anker cable I got it does have the e-marker chip listed in the details.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B...ag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=UUacUvbUpU6617485

 

[Mooncatt]

This is the Anker cable I got it does have the e-marker chip listed in the details.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B...ag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=UUacUvbUpU6617502

Again, the e-marker designation isn't what you need to look for. Yes, that cable would work, but not because of the e-marker chip. It's because it's USB 3.1 Gen 2 certified. For example, this cable has an e-marker chip but is USB 3.1 Gen 1, and NOT compatible with the Note 10+ and 45W charger.

https://www.delock.com/produkt/83668/merkmale.html

If you see a Gen 2 spec'd cable, no need to look for a reference to the e-marker chip since that's included by default in the spec. Thankfully it looks like most popular brands are selling Gen 2 spec cables now, but we are still in the transition period. People need to know what to look for and what not to look for.

 

[Mooncatt]

I would also like to know this if someone could direct me which cord is the best to use. I was thinking of this one but not sure if it's compatible:

Anker PowerLine+ C to C 2.0 cable (6ft), High Durability, for USB Type-C Devices Including Samsung Galaxy Note 8 S8 S8+ S9, iPad Pro 2018, Google Pixel, Nexus 6P, Huawei Matebook, MacBook and More https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LNA0XC...ag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=UUacUvbUpU6617513

That cable would not give you full capabilities, as it is USB 2.0, not 3.1 Gen 2. The cable @Casper4 linked to would be fully compatible, but I can't personally speak to its quality.

 

[Golfdriver97]

As I understand it, if any cable can do 10 GBps or more transfer speed, then that has both the e mark chip and falls under correct USB specifications?

 

[Mooncatt]

As I understand it, if any cable can do 10 GBps or more transfer speed, then that has both the e mark chip and falls under correct USB specifications?

Yes, the 10Gbps is actually part of the designation for the logo, which would mean it meets all aspects of Gen 2.

 

[Borarjti]

This meets the requirements for fast charging for our phones correct? I want a longer cable lol

 

[Serkle K]

This meets the requirements for fast charging for our phones correct? I want a longer cable lol

Yes. USB 3.1 Gen2 and capable of transferring 10GBps. I ordered a couple and they should be here sometime today.

 

[svtcobra]

Yes. USB 3.1 Gen2 and capable of transferring 10GBps. I ordered a couple and they should be here sometime today.

Ditto.

 

[Y2Dre]

Here's the cable I bought: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B...ag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=UUacUvbUpU6622306

 

[DrRafaelPenguin]

Has anyone found a 6 foot earmarked cable yet that would work? Haven't been able to find one yet.