Finally the Speedtest G between SD and Exynos version

I'm more interested in battery life, yes it is much quicker in speed which is annoying coming from an Exynos user but I don't game on my phones.
Someone bring on a direct comparison for battery to get a true measure and how ever much % it is higher than Exynos, I will ask Samsung for a rebate lol.
 
It's done between the smaller versions that doesn't deserve to be called a Note.
Let's see the difference between the two Ultras, it is the only figures that matters a little bit.
 
I think it will be the same with the ultra as it is done on processor. But yes. Will be interesting.
 
Yeah if your doing gaming then your phone will be toasty and battery will trickle away according to Chris (Tech Spurt)
but looking at those battery drain tests, they were getting over 8 hours, we shall see eh!

Yeah I’m not gamer but I round use my new tab S7 plus for that I would say.

Getting the phone tomorrow so will see and give it time to get used to it
 
Wow Exynos sucks , they need to discontinue the Exynos and give them Snapdragon.
 
Wow Exynos sucks , they need to discontinue the Exynos and give them Snapdragon.
If it wasn't for the loyalty pay out they have with Qualcomm probably all be on Exynos, they won't get rid of their in house made chip..
 
Sad part about the comparison, its obvious Samsung gimped the 865+ performance in the Note 20 Ultra (or botched the design and it gets too hot and throttled) because that time is way behind other phones (even phones rocking a plain old 865).

All the video did for me was let me know if I want a device with an 865+ dont buy a Samsung!!!
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
957,193
Messages
6,971,804
Members
3,163,735
Latest member
Bry