ICS Quadrant Scores?

[DeCourseyyy]

I'm running oICSv13 with Matr1x on 200/1200 smartassv2.

Constant 2500s



...tapatalk'd

 

[Paul627g]

Yep thats the neighborhood I'm in.... To be completely honest... I don't pay much attention to any benchmark scores... I ran [ACS][ROM][PORT]Sbrissen's TSM Pool Party [ALL VERSIONS]
for weeks and it never produced high benchmarks with any kernel I tried but it was probably the most dependable and snappiest ROM I've used. Bottom line, scores are fun to look at but its still real world that matters...

For the record, ICS is still sluggish and will be until we have an official release for the NS4G. All these builds are build off source for the GN so expect things to be a bit more optimized once its actually built for our specific device.

Just my 2 cents...

 

[DeCourseyyy]

I agree, its just hard to argue about "mine is snappier" and its nice to just have a solid score that everyone can compare :-/

...tapatalk'd

 

[evoldroid]

Is it better to have high numbers or low numbers.I did three test and i came up with these numbers let me know if this is good or bad 3102,2469,2409

 

[betachains]

I too get Quadrant scores in the 2000's. But....ICS at the moment is quite sluggish compared with GB. So what is the point in these scores?

 

[evoldroid]

New at this not sure if these are good or bad

 

[chud]

Those are good numbers and the higher the better.

Whether or not they actually mean anything is a whole other story

 

[evoldroid]

Those are good numbers and the higher the better.

Whether or not they actually mean anything is a whole other story

lol ok

 

[Paul627g]

Still all comes down to real world performance.. If its doing what you want and not lagging up then that is all that matters....