LTE on in Dallas TX

[JHBThree]

That's actually not a very good lte speed at all o.o. But I guess of ur on sprint its more than a your use to. This is real lte http://db.tt/rOedzAkY

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

No. Your speeds are the speeds of an unloaded network with twice the bandwidth. Sprint's speeds are about normal, and pretty much what you can expect in most places on Verizon now too.

 

[RanChan03]

i'm in arlington, and i haven't seen anything over here.

 

[ntorres6]

I was in Arlington yesterday and never got a 4G signal either...

 

[slam922]

Nothing so far in Frisco.

 

[klamer]

At noon today I drove from Arlington to Ft Worth (lil west of E loop 820) along 30 I I didn't see any 4G

 

[ntorres6]

There is 4G in the intersection of I30 and 820...I had it yesterday while I was in that area...I have noticed that if you lose the signal sometimes you have to toggle between lte/cdma and cdma to get signal back, or toggle airplane mode, works the same...

 

[xXBLACKBERRYXx5]

No. Your speeds are the speeds of an unloaded network with twice the bandwidth. Sprint's speeds are about normal, and pretty much what you can expect in most places on Verizon now too.

are you saying not as many people are using lte on at&t's network? because thats really a stupid thing for you to say seeing as sprint just got lte today rofl.

 

[rsa]

No 4G in north Dallas/Carrollton area!

 

[andyvance]

No LTE in Las Colinas.

 

[kiwicarlos741]

are you saying not as many people are using lte on at&t's network? because thats really a stupid thing for you to say seeing as sprint just got lte today rofl.

Uh where do u base this statement off of, ppl were posting pics of LTE live when the phone was released, nice try buddy

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

 

[xXBLACKBERRYXx5]

Uh where do u base this statement off of, ppl were posting pics of LTE live when the phone was released, nice try buddy

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

Ur saying when the evo lte was released? U have no idea what ur talking about lol

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

 

[kiwicarlos741]

Removed by moderator
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

 

[JHBThree]

And this is coming from a att user who hasn't been following the EVO threads since launch, let me inform u since u seem to lack even the slightest bit of knowledge, go check LTE goes live in Houston a couple threads downfrom this one, oh and why don't u tell me what the first post was posted on, June 15th with a screenshot u idiot, that's not even the earliest one I've seen. You obviously are r*****ed just cause sprint says the launch date was recent doesn't mean it wasn't live, so next time u want to post a comment with no common knowledge on the subject, do your homework before hand. Yeah I have no idea bout what I'm talking bout, if this were true then that means u have the mind of a five year old. Nice try again but, u fail
Hahaha
Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

The network did not go live until this weekend. There may have been pockets that were active for sprint testing, but the network was neither at full strength nor fully active until yesterday/today.

 

[JHBThree]

are you saying not as many people are using lte on at&t's network? because thats really a stupid thing for you to say seeing as sprint just got lte today rofl.

No, what I'm saying is that atts network is both unloaded AND higher capacity due to more bandwidth. It makes a difference with speeds.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[xXBLACKBERRYXx5]

No, what I'm saying is that atts network is both unloaded AND higher capacity due to more bandwidth. It makes a difference with speeds.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

So ur just proving my point that att is faster? I'm not all that techie I just know 55 mbps is a lot faster than 10

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

 

[EconomicMayhem]

I don't have an explanation for our upload download differences. In Korea 4G is not new and upload speeds are much higher than download. Your download speeds are faster or equal to upload. I wonder why. I assume in Korea the download speeds are governed to allow everyone access where the upload speeds seem not to be managed at all.

Sent from my LG-F160S, LG Optimus LTE 2

 

[JHBThree]

So ur just proving my point that att is faster? I'm not all that techie I just know 55 mbps is a lot faster than 10

Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums

I never said att wasn't faster. You claimed att has 'real' lte in an attempt to put down sprints network. What you fail to understand is the reason why sprints speeds are different, why your insinuations are wrong, and why sprints network is every bit as advanced as atts.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

[kiwicarlos741]

I never said att wasn't faster. You claimed att has 'real' lte in an attempt to put down sprints network. What you fail to understand is the reason why sprints speeds are different, why your insinuations are wrong, and why sprints network is every bit as advanced as atts.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

The guy doesn't know what he talking about (not u jhbthree), that's why he had nothing to say to my response before it was removed and completely ignored it, he's just looking to bash sprint and yet I get an infraction for proving my point to him, he was already wrong before and hell just keep talking without any foundation to what he says

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums

 

[colleenrocks]

still on 3G in Carrollton/Lewisville. I work in North Dallas, hope to see 4g tomorrow AM.

 

[kiwicarlos741]

And for the record the fastest 4g LTE by sprint I saw was at 51 mbs down which was during the so call testing phase which I can understand there was prolly no one using the bandwidth thus making it soo high. Regadless of testing or not it was live ( meaning it was running) when the EVO first launched and many threads with timestamps prove this

Sent from my EVO using Android Central Forums