External extended batteries like I posted? Thats only if someone decided to make one.
I still think its a bad idea. who's gonna want to attach an external battery to their phone..
External extended batteries like I posted? Thats only if someone decided to make one.
Who said the battery isn't removable?
http://guide-images.ifixit.net/igi/t5Hyy2km1AB5d1GG.huge
http://guide-images.ifixit.net/igi/qMMgN1qQFXs1KNyn.huge
Look how thin!!
http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Motorola-Droid-RAZR-Teardown/7048/1That battery is HUGE.
I wonder how you remove the Kevlar (if you wanted to).
I'm still holding confidence in Motorola that they engineered it well and we won't have to worry. Like I said, if Apple hasn't had problems, Moto shouldn't.
IT IS still an issue from two different perspectives.
One, the combination of button pushes is software related, If the software is screwed up, will it recognize the button inputs and shut down the phone? This phone really needs a recesed restart button that is an actual mechanical link between and actual circuit from the battery to the circuit board.
The other thing that sort of worries me is if you really need to keep the phone off and it won't stay off. Those with the Droid X may have encountered the fact that after GB, if you turned off the phone, it came back on. If you set it into airplane mode, it came back on. Not a great idea when flying. Especially when it rings and the flight attendant is five feet away.
Only way I have found to guarantee my X will not turn on suddenly whiile flying is to PULL the battery.
Definitely will be fine with the button pushes to reset. But one of your main desires in a phone shouldn't be "be able to pull the battery so I can reboot when the software crashes"
iPhone handles it fine, mine has crashed a lot more than I'd care to admit, and my Galaxy Tab handles it fine. Seriously, don't worry about it so much. The button-reset is in a much lower-level portion of the firmware, which I doubt is affected by any actions of the user, including rooting and flashing a new ROM.
No one is buying this phone excited about GB, and if Motorola didn't announce ICS in a "short" while it would have lost a LOT of buyers.
And if ICS wasn't on the near horizon the Razr sales would be triple what they are now. It's all relative.
I understand the complaints about Moto, but many Sammy owners are as upset with their phones as you are with Moto.
Sent from my Droid, the only mobile OS that matters.
I think it can be an issue. Especially with Motorola and their history of buggy software updates. No one is buying this phone excited about GB, and if Motorola didn't announce ICS in a "short" while it would have lost a LOT of buyers. It's well known that Motorola is putting out buggy junk. Case in point; the previous posters issues with his Droix X with GB. My issues with a Droid 2 and Droid 2 Global (more different than I had orginally thought - they are not the same phone or very similar other than looks - both use different software). The Droid 3 was released with tons of bugs that required a bug fix. The Droid Bionic was released with so many bugs they had to release a push update for IT as well. So maybe with other manufacturers it's not so much of concern, but it is or should be with Motorola's past history.
If you're Motorola phone works fine, great. But seeing first hand what poor software this company is putting out makes it a concern for anyone who's dealth with their bugs. The Droid RAZR offers something you can't get anywhere else - the super slim case. The Droid 4 is going to offer a QWERTY keyboard with a "slimmer" case then the Droid 3 and QWERTY keyboard with LTE, which is rare on a keyboard phone. I would never have bought a Motorola again, or even considered them, but Samsung decieded to put out the Stratosphere QWERTY LTE phone with a single core processor. And I'll be damned if I get stuck with that for the next 2 years. My worry is if I go with Motorola again I'll be stuck with nothing for part of those two years.