Note 2 > Note 3

Good photos?

sent from my Note 3

Photos look much better on the note 3. Have em both and have been using then side by side. Low light is better on the note 2 because if a software setting. Nothing the hardware on the note 3 *can't* do that I am aware of.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
The note 2 is a great device. I can understand why one would want to see it through another year....cheers.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
I don't know if it's software, but we agree the Note 2 takes better photos.



sent from my Note 3

Not even close. The note 3 takes better pictures overall I think and from what I see from the two blown up on my pc. Day pics note 3. Night pics note 2. Overall, note 3. Hopefully the vampires can join us sans a software update for the note 3.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Note 2 had "legendary" low light camera? Realy?

Posted via Android Central App

Legendary. It would suck all the light up out of the room, splash it back inside your photo, smear that light all around in all the right places, and even add a bit of its own. Epic. Unworldly. Like the Mona Lisa. Like 70's KISS. I would dare say even like Vince Neil before he got fat.

sent from my Note 3
 
have you tried the stabalize feature? it takes pretty good low light pics. without flash.

Thanks. I believe the camera defaults to image stabilization in auto mode. You have to actually turn it off if, for some reason, you want your photos to come out even worse.

sent from my Note 3
 
Note 3.
uqa5ary4.jpg


Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
The N3's camera is f/2.2 while the N2's camera is f/2.6

Spec-wise, the N3 has the brighter lens and should take better low light pictures.
 
I really don't think there is enough to nitpick or decide one is legendary and the other sucks. They are both cellphone cameras. Note 2 lets in more light and the note 3 lets in more detail. Pick your poison, but I think the note 3 actually looks better because of the details it picks up where the note 2 can't.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Note 2 lets in more light and the note 3 lets in more detail. Pick your poison, but I think the note 3 actually looks better because of the details it picks up where the note 2 can't.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

No way a f/2.6 lens lets in more light than a f/2.2 lens
 
Seems like I can see the outline of those chairs in the note 2 pic more but the details of the tank are more garbled than the note 3 pic. All I know is the low light pics on the note 3 seem better.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Seems like I can see the outline of those chairs in the note 2 pic more but the details of the tank are more garbled than the note 3 pic. All I know is the low light pics on the note 3 seem better.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Yes. Those low light pics ~of light~ are a classic demonstration. Thanks for the chuckle.

sent from my Note 3
 
Yes. Those low light pics ~of light~ are a classic demonstration. Thanks for the chuckle.

sent from my Note 3
They both look like crap, so the argument which one looks less like crap?? Interesting thread. Just got my 3, the note 3 picture is less filling less crap to me. :cool:
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
956,444
Messages
6,968,270
Members
3,163,548
Latest member
Groundhog349