TraderGary
Trusted Member
- Apr 12, 2012
- 3,059
- 58
- 48
I have a couple of rooms where I've installed those really cool antique yellow/orange bulbs. Manual White Balance is a requirement!
Here's a pic of my x mas a party. You could really blame lighting not knowing the circumstances of the picture. I'm telling you this is a crap picture though. I can't side by side it w a good one because it's the only one I have, but this pic is terrible and it's definitely the camera not the user or lighting or focus. It was actually warm light in there, not harsh florescent light.
That's a hard scene to capture accurately. Smart phone cameras and cameras in general aren't good at knowing your intent when composing a picture. The bright light appears to be causing issues and making the rest of the pic darker and messing up the white balance.
Off topic, that's a metro North train isn't it? Lol sit on one every day.
On topic, the iPhone looks too warm and oversaturated. It's what people like. Also you cannot judge a picture based on an internet post as everyone has a different screen, phone, calibration setting etc.
You may have a bad camera but only way to know is a true apples to apples comparison. Sam le pic, same time, same lighting viewed on the same screen.
I could be wrong but I think you mean the bright light would through off the exposure.
Thank you all so much for weighing in. I really appreciate all your opinions. I'll post more photos as soon as I have a chance.
OK, I realize that I seem to be only person out there who seems to have this issue, and that's why I'm looking for answers. I love everything about the Google Pixel 2 and am very happy I made the decision to switch to Android (coming from an iPhone).
That said, I can't believe why the Pixel 2's camera has received so much praise, because it has yet to produce a photo I consider adequate. I'm not a pro photographer, but I'm not a doofus either. I'm a hobby photog who knows his way around apertures, exposure times and composition. I know enough to use my dSLR exclusively in manual mode and get the results I want.
Last weekend, I took photos with my Pixel 2 on a backpacking trip. They looked decent on the screen, and I was excited to show them to my wife (who wasn't able to join me on the trip) by casting them onto my smart TV. The results were such that I didn't bother to show the shots to my wife. The colors were drab, the resolution awful - reducing the stark, beautiful landscape of the Arizona desert to pixelated mush.
yesterday, I compared the Pixel to my old iPhone 6 Plus by taking a macro shot of a beetle. The attached photos speak for themselves, I think. The iPhone kills the Pixel, no contest. Both photos were taken at the same time, from the same angle and not edited in any way.
Upper image (portrait) is Pixel 2: no depth of field, colors cold and harsh, contrast too hard, lack of sharpness. Lower image (square) is iPhone: nice depth of field, warm, realistic colors, good detail and sharpness.
So, given that everybody seems to think the Pixel 2 camera is the best of any smartphone, I'm wondering if I'm missing something. Does this camera need to be set up in any way, or calibrated, or does it need some kind of software tweaks to produce the results it is being hyped for?
View attachment 278180
Thanks for the tip. I played around with the WB settings before, but not lately. I'll try that. Although I still expect a camera to be able to auto-adjust its WB settings in this day and age, especially in well-lit outdoor situations...
Try using the camera in auto mode instead of manual.
One of the few compliants I read about the camera is the photos can suffer in quality outside of the auto mode.
I find auto white balance doesn't always get it right.
Here's a sample in auto
Every picture I took was off. I took a bunch and compared them to previous photos I had taken with my first pixel 2. I took pictures indoors, outdoors, in low light and perfect light. I took pictures similar to ones I had taken with my first p2.
When I got my replacement pixel 2, I didn't have to make any adjustments and I pretty much use it in auto all the time. The pictures are like night and day.
What I'm saying is, and I said this when I posted that picture, you can make a lot of excuses for why it's a bad picture, but I'm telling you it was the camera.
It's going to be hard, if not impossible, for the op to convince you it's not him.
I think op got one with a bad camera bc I had the same thing happen. Pictures weren't terrible but they weren't good either.
But I digress!![]()
No excuses here... Just trying to help rule out any possibilities. The OP asked for help and as part of the volunteer team here, that is what I and the rest of the team members do. Sorry that you feel we are trying blame the OP for poor results.
I don't think you're blaming him, I just think without being there it's easy to find a lot of reasons for a shot to be bad.![]()
Granted that some posters may be searching for reasons.
Thanks for the tip. I played around with the WB settings before, but not lately. I'll try that. Although I still expect a camera to be able to auto-adjust its WB settings in this day and age, especially in well-lit outdoor situations...