vzwuser76
Well-known member
- Jan 28, 2011
- 1,669
- 26
- 0
After receiving the phone last night and playing around with it:
- I do have the faint ticking, only mildly annoying and I'm willing to see what they do with a possible software fix.
- Set up on Project Fi with eSIM was super smooth, I'm liking the service so far. Project Fi is half the reason I wanted this phone.
- I'm happy with the screen in all aspects including viewing angles, I wish it was about 5% wider and had a 2:1 aspect ration with small bezels.....but hey there is always next year. I'm coming from a 5.2" screen and it sounds dumb but I do miss that 0.2" diagonal.
- Camera is so good in low light such as inside at night with lamps on.
- Phone call quality is great, but my last phone was pretty bad so for all I know it is average.
- Bluetooth seems good in my car (2015 VW Golf), no problems and seems quick to connect.
- Phone was awesome when I just used Android Pay, it paid faster, smoother, and from further away than my old phone.....it surprised me how fast it completed the transaction. It seems like better NFC plus the faster processor in general.
- WiFi seems good but I haven't done any in depth testing.
- Speakers are ok but definitely "bright" sounding....they will get the job done when I want to watch a quick YouTube video on the phone instead of Chromecast. They are speakers in a thin light weight phone so I don't expect any miracles here, you can't beat physics.
- Ambient display isn't as good as the "Moto Display" from my 2014 Moto X....I wish Google would have kept the rights to copy that when they sold off Motorola to Lenovo (for Lenovo to ruin the Moto brand). For all I know maybe they could copy it and just choose not to.
- In general the phone is really great and I'm glad that I bought it. Next year I hope they make the minor form factor tweaks to make the smaller phone even better (more screen, less bezel)
I agree with you that Google should've either kept the software for Moto's enhancements, or at the very least made an agreement with Lenovo to be able to use them on their Nexus/Pixel lines. Like Moto Voice for example allowed you to change the hot word to start voice actions instead of limiting it to OK Google. Moto Actions/Assist had a few things to customize settings based on your location (in car, at work, or at home).
But on the subject of the Always On Display vs Moto Display, they are two fairly different animals. Moto Display kept the display off for the majority of the time, and only awoke it if it was moved (on the first gen) or you waved a hand over it (on the second gen after Moto added IR sensors to the face). Moto added Moto Display as a battery saving/convenience feature. They used a separate low power chip to handle their add on functions (Moto Display along with Voice and Actions) to save power but still adding functionality. From what I've seen from AOD, I think it uses less battery than having the chip register movement and turning on the display. It may not show things as well as Moto's implementation did, but I think it's actually more power efficient just leaving it on on low power.
But either AOD or Moto Display are far better implementations than what Google previously used, Ambient Display. On that it worked similar to the original Moto Display in that you had to move the phone from a lying down position to an upright position to display info. In my time with both the 6p and the Pixel 1, I found Ambient Display to be pretty hit and miss. Sometimes it took a few tries to get it to work. At that point, it would take less effort to simply turn on the display, and it probably took less power as well.
Myself, I'm happy with AOD. The icons are small but I can figure out what they're supposed to be. Notifications still show up when they come in and are readable. And most of the time I used Moto Display's touch to expand, I ended up turning on the display so I could read the entire notification anyway, so this isn't a big step back IMO.